In spanning tree world, size does matter, and smaller is always better! :-)
If you want to affect the downstream switch's path selection, use port priority. If you want to affect the current switch's path selection, use cost value Sent from my iPhone On Feb 2, 2013, at 11:46 AM, "Samir Idris" <[email protected]> wrote: > lower port priority is better but the change has to be made on the port > upstream. > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, robert shepherd > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I get confused on the spanning-tree port-priority command at the interface >> level >> and want to get clairification. >> For example: >> Fa0/19 - 20 are configured in an ether-channel. >> Make sure that port 19 is preferred over port 20. >> >> spanning-tree port-priority 0 >> spanning-tree port-priority 240 >> >> In other words is lower value better or worse? >> >> On a side note. This forum, staff and contributors are great. I am >> counting down at this >> point to my 1st lab attempt. Less than 3 months and counting. >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > -- > Samir Idris > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
