Yes they show as adjacent but they don't work. This is actually a very good troubleshooting problem since by appearances it "should" work. If you look in the OSPF database you should see "advertising router is not reachable".
For more information http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009481a.shtml On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Marc > > they formed adjaceny with each other showing state as FULL/- > > even the routes are in LSDB..only they are not in routing table > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> They form the neighborship because the timers match but you don't >> actually form a full adjacency because they don't agree on whether to use a >> DR. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> why is it so with OSPF.. >>> >>> If configure one end as p-p and other end as broadcast..they will form >>> neighbor as full but will not see routes in routing table though they >>> will >>> be in LSDB >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Marc Abel >> CCIE #35470 >> (Routing and Switching) >> > > -- Marc Abel CCIE #35470 (Routing and Switching) _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
