Why not get real specific? If you use a /21 subnet mask you would match .32
- .39

Obviously your 192 network isn't fitting in there


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Wilberth E. Lemaître <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I was able to see the logic, if I use 3 bits the ranges would go like
> these:
>
> 10.0.0.0 - 10.0.31.255
> 10.0.32.0 - 10.0.63.255
> 10.0.64.0 - 10.0.95.255
>
> As we can see, they will all catch in the second range. Correct me if I am
> wrong?
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: OSPF Summarization
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:27:49 -0600
>
>
>
>
> Hello community,
>
> I have a question in regards summarization.
> Let's say I have area 2 configured on a router, the advertised networks
> are the following:
>
> router ospf xxx
>  network 10.0.32.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
>  network 10.0.33.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
>  network 10.0.34.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
>  network 10.0.36.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
>  network 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
>
> I want to summarize area 2, the mechanism I use for summarization is the
> following and correct me if I am wrong. I look for the octet where the
> decimal number changes, or where the bits are not equal. As we can see this
> happens on the 3rd octet and I start using increments with each octet value:
>
> 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
>
> I wonder myself which increment or which number would catch all of those
> into one advertisement counting from zero, in other words, how many binary
> digits I have to convert to 1 in order to do the summarization.
> Based on this scenario, 32 would catch less than what we need, 64 would be
> the perfect one, and I will need to convert only 2 bits (the first 2 bits)
> and  my subnet mask would look like 11111111.11111111.11000000.00000000 and
> the network range would go like this:
>
> 10.0.0.0 - 10.0.63.255
> 10.0.64.0- 10.0.127.255
>
> As we can see, if I use a subnet mask of 18, I will be including ranges
> that are NOT necessary.
>
> What would be the efficient summarization in order to accomplish this
> scenario? Please explain ;)
>
> Best regards,
> Wilberth
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>



-- 
Marc Abel
CCIE #35470
(Routing and Switching)
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to