Remove me from mailing list please.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 93, Issue 21
Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Written Exam (Brandon Bigelow)
2. Simple QOS Question (Joe S)
3. Re: Simple QOS Question (Tony Singh)
4. Re: Simple QOS Question (Joe S)
5. Re: Simple QOS Question (Joe S)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:59:08 -0500
From: Brandon Bigelow <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Written Exam
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
I failed the written with a 748 last night. I was pretty angry about it too.
Things I would consider mundane and not relevant to a CCIE candidate, Cisco
evidently thinks is. I guess I just had to see that style of questioning once.
I know I probably sound spiteful having failed. I?m not giving up though. I?m
scheduling my retake as soon as I can get in. Got to get my number!
Brandon
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:38:56 -0500
From: Joe S <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Simple QOS Question
Message-ID:
<CAGFq-YZSTz9z9i8rPiE5jxgJfPf2HNkbESJCsj8Xn=k1ofz...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
As I continue through I find another difference between my solution and the
DSG's solution. And I'm having trouble finding an answer online.
In a policy map, what is the difference between a "police" command and a
"police rate" command?
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:45:25 +0100
From: Tony Singh <[email protected]>
To: Joe S <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Simple QOS Question
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Joe
Here's some of my notes, read the RFC's below for a deeper understanding.
Single Rate Two Color Policer (One Bucket)
police 96 bc x be x
confirm action
exced action
Single Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [srTCM RFC 2697]
police cir x bc x be x
confirm action
exceed action
violate action
Two Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [trTCM RFC 2698]
Here you define CIR and PIR
police rate (cir) x (pir) x
confirm action
exceed action
violate action
The buckets by definition are either conform=one and conform and violate=two
--
BR
Tony
Sent from my iPhone on 3
> On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:38, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As I continue through I find another difference between my solution
> and the DSG's solution. And I'm having trouble finding an answer online.
>
> In a policy map, what is the difference between a "police" command and
> a "police rate" command?
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:50:17 -0500
From: Joe S <[email protected]>
To: Tony Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Simple QOS Question
Message-ID:
<CAGFq-YaENzOdYJhBu3N=djt7f_hsgq5onzoe_stvmvm-2ii...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I appreciate the feedback, and if I'd asked my question more clearly maybe it
would have been a bit better.
The only stipulation in the lab was "Limit FTP traffic to 750Kbps".
So in my answer I just did:
class-map FTP
match protocol secure-ftp
match protocol ftp
policy-map LIMIT
class FTP
police 750000
Meanwhile, the book solution was the exact same thing except their police
statement was:
police rate 750000
It's a difficult set of stuff to search for, too, because a word like "rate"
tends to show up on all the same pages as "police" anyway...
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Joe
>
> Here's some of my notes, read the RFC's below for a deeper understanding.
>
> Single Rate Two Color Policer (One Bucket)
>
> police 96 bc x be x
> confirm action
> exced action
>
>
> Single Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [srTCM RFC 2697]
>
> police cir x bc x be x
> confirm action
> exceed action
> violate action
>
>
> Two Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [trTCM RFC 2698]
>
> Here you define CIR and PIR
>
> police rate (cir) x (pir) x
> confirm action
> exceed action
> violate action
>
> The buckets by definition are either conform=one and conform and
> violate=two
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPhone on 3
>
> > On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:38, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > As I continue through I find another difference between my solution
> > and
> the
> > DSG's solution. And I'm having trouble finding an answer online.
> >
> > In a policy map, what is the difference between a "police" command
> > and a "police rate" command?
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:53:01 -0500
From: Joe S <[email protected]>
To: Tony Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Simple QOS Question
Message-ID:
<CAGFq-YbfdzRQcmn8i6paDe_QUXd1W3QM-yucSn=vnifv6au...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Gaah....class-map match-any FTP
Nobody needs to correct me on that part!
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote:
> I appreciate the feedback, and if I'd asked my question more clearly
> maybe it would have been a bit better.
>
> The only stipulation in the lab was "Limit FTP traffic to 750Kbps".
>
> So in my answer I just did:
> class-map FTP
> match protocol secure-ftp
> match protocol ftp
> policy-map LIMIT
> class FTP
> police 750000
>
> Meanwhile, the book solution was the exact same thing except their
> police statement was:
> police rate 750000
>
> It's a difficult set of stuff to search for, too, because a word like
> "rate" tends to show up on all the same pages as "police" anyway...
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> Here's some of my notes, read the RFC's below for a deeper understanding.
>>
>> Single Rate Two Color Policer (One Bucket)
>>
>> police 96 bc x be x
>> confirm action
>> exced action
>>
>>
>> Single Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [srTCM RFC 2697]
>>
>> police cir x bc x be x
>> confirm action
>> exceed action
>> violate action
>>
>>
>> Two Rate Three Color Policer (Two Buckets) [trTCM RFC 2698]
>>
>> Here you define CIR and PIR
>>
>> police rate (cir) x (pir) x
>> confirm action
>> exceed action
>> violate action
>>
>> The buckets by definition are either conform=one and conform and
>> violate=two
>>
>> --
>> BR
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone on 3
>>
>> > On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:38, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > As I continue through I find another difference between my solution
>> > and
>> the
>> > DSG's solution. And I'm having trouble finding an answer online.
>> >
>> > In a policy map, what is the difference between a "police" command
>> > and a "police rate" command?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >
>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>
>
>
End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 93, Issue 21
***************************************
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
