Use the backdoor command for the particular network you want to be seen as 
better from the igp. 

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device.  
Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) 

On Nov 30, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Narendra Naukwal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Imran,
> 
> Yes that is what I exactly meant.
> Distance in BGP is used for competing with other protocols only. In other 
> routing protocols (like EIGRP) distance can be tweaked to choose internal 
> over erxternal, however, that is not the case with BGP.
> External routes are always preferred over internal & this is not based on 
> distance.
> Here is a detailed analysis of why router selected external path:
> 
> 
> 4#show ip bgp 1.1.1.0
> BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24, version 4
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to 
> update-groups: 1 12 10.0.0.1 from 20.0.0.3 (20.0.0.3)             Origin IGP, 
> metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal 12 20.0.0.2 from 20.0.0.2 (20.0.0.2) 
>             Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best Comparing two 
> paths as per the BGP path selection process. Comparing path 1 with path 2: 
> Both paths have reachable next hops Both paths have a WEIGHT of 0 Both paths 
> have a LOCAL_PREF of 100 Both paths are learned Both paths have AS_PATH 
> length 1 Both paths are of origin IGP Both paths have the same neighbor AS, 
> 12, so comparing MED. Both paths have a MED of 0 Path 2 is better than path 1 
> because an external path is preferred over an internal path. {Not because of 
> distance but because the protocols developers wanted it to be this way :)} 
> This is the reason that the best path is #2As per the BGP best path selection 
> process, External is preferred if all the above
> parameters are same.
> 
> Thanks,
> Narendra
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, 1 December 2013 3:01 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> changing AD of  ebgp to 201  forces ibgp routes...to get into the routing 
>> table.....
> 
> Imran - this statement is not correct.
> 
> 
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
> :: Free Video Training: http://youtube.com/IPexpertInc
> :: Social: http://twitter.com/@icemarkom | http://fb.me/ccie18427
> :: IPexpert: http://www.ipexpert.com/Communities | +1-810-326-1444
> _______________________________________________
> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
> 
> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to