This could have been a bug.  There is a known issue like this with RIP
authentication.  If you can't get it to work, I recommend removing the
config and re-adding it, or removing the config, rebooting and
re-adding...if you time your write mems correctly then it can work out
better for you.  A similar approach could have fixed this problem.

V/r,

Ryan Krcelic



On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:15 PM, rauenpc . <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sure did. Also, at the end of my lab time slot I pasted the same config
> onto two different routers in the lab and it worked without issue so my
> mind is pointing more towards a hardware related issue than a configuration
> issue... but then again I might just be biased in favor of my own skills.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Ryanlk18 . <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> During all of this, did you ever try a reload?
>>
>> V/r,
>>
>> Ryan Krcelic
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, rauenpc . <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that this matters at this point, but today I had another lab session,
>>> but this time with a different pod. I copy/pasted my configuration from
>>> yesterday, and everything came up without issue. I did not have any of
>>> the
>>> additional commands suggested in this thread applied, just what was in
>>> the
>>> DSG. So either something was going on in the config that I couldn't
>>> recognize, or there was possibly some type of hardware issue going.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Mills, Derek (NAZ-V) <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > FWIW... once you configured Frame Relay switching you needed to turn
>>> keep
>>> > alives back on.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:
>>> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of rauenpc .
>>> > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 10:42 AM
>>> > To: Gbenga Olubisi
>>> > Cc: [email protected]
>>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoFR
>>> >
>>> > Before my time slot ended, I decided to give it one more shot, but this
>>> > time on routers R7 and R8. It was a straight copy/paste of the other
>>> > routers, except that the interface was se0/0/0 instead of se0/2/0.
>>> >
>>> > R7#
>>> > interface Multilink1
>>> >  ip address 150.20.25.5 255.255.255.0
>>> >  ppp multilink
>>> >  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > !
>>> > interface Serial0/0/0
>>> >  no ip address
>>> >  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> >  no keepalive
>>> >  clock rate 2000000
>>> >  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay interface-dlci
>>> 502
>>> > ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay interface-dlci 555 ppp
>>> Virtual-Template1
>>> > !
>>> > interface Virtual-Template1
>>> >  no ip address
>>> >  ppp multilink
>>> >  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > !
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > R8#
>>> > interface Multilink1
>>> >  ip address 150.20.25.2 255.255.255.0
>>> >  ppp multilink
>>> >  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > !
>>> > interface Serial0/0/0
>>> >  no ip address
>>> >  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> >  no keepalive
>>> >  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay interface-dlci
>>> 502
>>> > ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay interface-dlci 555 ppp
>>> Virtual-Template1
>>> > !
>>> > interface Virtual-Template1
>>> >  no ip address
>>> >  ppp multilink
>>> >  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > !
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *Dec  2 16:32:22.395: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>>> > Multilink1, changed state to down *Dec  2 16:32:22.987: %LINK-3-UPDOWN:
>>> > Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to up *Dec  2 16:32:22.991:
>>> > %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access3, changed state to up *Dec  2
>>> > 16:32:22.991: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access4, changed state
>>> to
>>> > up *Dec  2 16:32:22.991: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access5,
>>> changed
>>> > state to up *Dec  2 16:32:23.003: %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR: MLPoFR not
>>> configured
>>> > properly on Link Virtual-Access1 Bundle Multilink1 :Frame Relay traffic
>>> > shaping must be enabled *Dec  2 16:32:23.007: %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR:
>>> MLPoFR
>>> > not configured properly on Link Virtual-Access3 Bundle Multilink1
>>> :Frame
>>> > Relay traffic shaping must be enabled R8(config-if)# *Dec  2
>>> 16:32:23.011:
>>> > %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR: MLPoFR not configured properly on Link
>>> Virtual-Access4
>>> > Bundle Multilink1 :Frame Relay traffic shaping must be enabled *Dec  2
>>> > 16:32:23.011: %FR-3-MLPOFR_ERROR: MLPoFR not configured properly on
>>> Link
>>> > Virtual-Access5 Bundle Multilink1 :Frame Relay traffic shaping must be
>>> > enabled *Dec  2 16:32:23.015: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Multilink1,
>>> changed
>>> > state to up R8(config-if)# *Dec  2 16:32:24.003: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN:
>>> Line
>>> > protocol on Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to up *Dec  2
>>> > 16:32:24.003: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
>>> > Virtual-Access3, changed state to up *Dec  2 16:32:24.003:
>>> > %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access4,
>>> changed
>>> > state to up *Dec  2 16:32:24.003: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
>>> > Interface Virtual-Access5, changed state to up *Dec  2 16:32:24.015:
>>> > %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Multilink1, changed
>>> state
>>> > to up R8(config-if)# R8(config-if)# R8(config-if)# R8(config-if)#
>>> > R8(config-if)#do ping 150.20.25.5
>>> >
>>> > Type escape sequence to abort.
>>> > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.20.25.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>> > !!!!!
>>> > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
>>> > R8(config-if)#
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Magically life seemed to be good. So what might have been the
>>> difference
>>> > between the two pairs of routers? When doing a show interface on
>>> routers 7
>>> > and 8, both were DTE, both had a clock rate command, and neither had
>>> the
>>> > frame-relay switching command applied. This to me seems to be the same
>>> as
>>> > routers R2 and R5 when I first started this configuration. Do you
>>> think it
>>> > would be possible there is a hardware issue on the serial interface
>>> going
>>> > from R2 to R5 (R&S POD 111)?
>>> >
>>> > Also, thanks to all who have been helping to give input on this issue
>>> for
>>> > me.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:11 AM, rauenpc . <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I'm in the same boat as you Gbenga... I can make it work in GNS3
>>> > > without any issue. Not so much with the lab equipment.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Gbenga Olubisi <
>>> > [email protected]>wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi rauenpc,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> just done this in GNS3 and it works.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> R5
>>> > >> ===
>>> > >>
>>> > >> !
>>> > >> frame-relay switching
>>> > >> !
>>> > >> !
>>> > >> interface Serial0/0
>>> > >>  no ip address
>>> > >>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>  serial restart-delay 0
>>> > >>  clock rate 2016000
>>> > >>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>> > >>   frame-relay interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >> intf-type dce !
>>> > >> interface Multilink1
>>> > >>  ip address 150.20.25.5 255.255.255.0  ppp multilink  ppp multilink
>>> > >> group 1 !
>>> > >>  !
>>> > >> interface Virtual-Template1
>>> > >>  no ip address
>>> > >>  ppp multilink
>>> > >>  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > >> !
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> R2
>>> > >> ==
>>> > >> !
>>> > >>  interface Serial0/0
>>> > >>  no ip address
>>> > >>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>  serial restart-delay 0
>>> > >>  clock rate 2016000
>>> > >>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>> > >>   frame-relay interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1 !
>>> > >> interface Multilink1
>>> > >>  ip address 150.20.25.2 255.255.255.0  ppp multilink  ppp multilink
>>> > >> group 1 !
>>> > >> interface Virtual-Template1
>>> > >>  no ip address
>>> > >>  ppp multilink
>>> > >>  ppp multilink group 1
>>> > >> !
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> R5#ping 150.20.25.2
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>> > >> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.20.25.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>> > >> !!!!!
>>> > >> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/31/48
>>> > >> ms R2#ping 150.20.25.5
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>> > >> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.20.25.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
>>> > >> !!!!!
>>> > >> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/30/44
>>> > >> ms
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM, rauenpc . <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> If it makes any difference, I applied the same commands to a couple
>>> > >>> routers in GNS3, and everything worked like a charm so the
>>> > >>> multilink, virtual-template, and frame-relay related commands under
>>> > >>> the serial interface seem to be all in order.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I also added the commands suggested by Gbenga, but the situation is
>>> > >>> the same, with the exception that se0/2/0 now shows as being DCE
>>> > >>> when doing a show interface.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Gbenga Olubisi
>>> > >>> <[email protected]
>>> > >>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> You need to configure frame-relay switching in the global config
>>> of
>>> > >>>> one of the switches e.g R5 Also configure the serial on that same
>>> > >>>> switch as DCE ---> frame-relay intf-type dce
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, rauenpc . <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>> They are both DTE, and if I try to remove the clock rate command
>>> > >>>>> on either side it does nothing.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#do show int se0/2/0
>>> > >>>>> Serial0/2/0 is up, line protocol is up
>>> > >>>>>   Hardware is GT96K Serial
>>> > >>>>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit/sec, DLY 20000 usec,
>>> > >>>>>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>>> > >>>>>   Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set
>>> > >>>>>   Keepalive not set
>>> > >>>>>   CRC checking enabled
>>> > >>>>>   LMI DLCI 1023  LMI type is CISCO  frame relay DTE
>>> > >>>>>   FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
>>> > >>>>>   Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface
>>> > >>>>> broadcasts 0
>>> > >>>>>   Last input 01:08:19, output 00:00:10, output hang never
>>> > >>>>>   Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:08:16
>>> > >>>>>   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output
>>> > drops: 0
>>> > >>>>>   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
>>> > >>>>>   Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
>>> > >>>>>      Conversations  0/1/256 (active/max active/max total)
>>> > >>>>>      Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
>>> > >>>>>      Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
>>> > >>>>>   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
>>> > >>>>>   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
>>> > >>>>>      6560 packets input, 134480 bytes, 0 no buffer
>>> > >>>>>      Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>>> > >>>>>      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0
>>> abort
>>> > >>>>>      6560 packets output, 134480 bytes, 0 underruns
>>> > >>>>>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
>>> > >>>>>      0 unknown protocol drops
>>> > >>>>>      0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>> > >>>>>      0 carrier transitions
>>> > >>>>>      DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#do show run int se0/2/0 Building configuration...
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Current configuration : 321 bytes
>>> > >>>>> !
>>> > >>>>> interface Serial0/2/0
>>> > >>>>>  no ip address
>>> > >>>>>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>>>>  no keepalive
>>> > >>>>>  clock rate 2000000
>>> > >>>>>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>>  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 502 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 555 ppp Virtual-Template1 end
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#int se0/2/0
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#no clock rate 2000000 R5(config-if)#do show run int
>>> > >>>>> se0/2/0 Building configuration...
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Current configuration : 321 bytes
>>> > >>>>> !
>>> > >>>>> interface Serial0/2/0
>>> > >>>>>  no ip address
>>> > >>>>>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>>>>  no keepalive
>>> > >>>>>  clock rate 2000000
>>> > >>>>>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>>  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 502 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 555 ppp Virtual-Template1 end
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R5(config-if)#
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R2#show int se0/2/0
>>> > >>>>> Serial0/2/0 is up, line protocol is up
>>> > >>>>>   Hardware is GT96K Serial
>>> > >>>>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit/sec, DLY 20000 usec,
>>> > >>>>>      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>>> > >>>>>   Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set
>>> > >>>>>   Keepalive not set
>>> > >>>>>   CRC checking enabled
>>> > >>>>>   LMI DLCI 1023  LMI type is CISCO  frame relay DTE
>>> > >>>>>   FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
>>> > >>>>>   Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface
>>> > >>>>> broadcasts 0
>>> > >>>>>   Last input 01:08:44, output 00:00:31, output hang never
>>> > >>>>>   Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:08:42
>>> > >>>>>   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output
>>> > drops: 0
>>> > >>>>>   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
>>> > >>>>>   Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
>>> > >>>>>      Conversations  0/1/256 (active/max active/max total)
>>> > >>>>>      Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
>>> > >>>>>      Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
>>> > >>>>>   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>> > >>>>>   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>> > >>>>>      6560 packets input, 134480 bytes, 0 no buffer
>>> > >>>>>      Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>>> > >>>>>      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0
>>> abort
>>> > >>>>>      6568 packets output, 134644 bytes, 0 underruns
>>> > >>>>>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
>>> > >>>>>      0 unknown protocol drops
>>> > >>>>>      0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>> > >>>>>      10 carrier transitions
>>> > >>>>>      DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R2#
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R2(config-if)#do show run int se0/2/0 Building configuration...
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Current configuration : 321 bytes
>>> > >>>>> !
>>> > >>>>> interface Serial0/2/0
>>> > >>>>>  no ip address
>>> > >>>>>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>>>>  no keepalive
>>> > >>>>>  clock rate 2000000
>>> > >>>>>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>>  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 502 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 555 ppp Virtual-Template1 end
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R2(config-if)#no clock rate 2000000 R2(config-if)#do sh run int
>>> > >>>>> se0/2/0 Building configuration...
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Current configuration : 321 bytes
>>> > >>>>> !
>>> > >>>>> interface Serial0/2/0
>>> > >>>>>  no ip address
>>> > >>>>>  encapsulation frame-relay
>>> > >>>>>  no keepalive
>>> > >>>>>  clock rate 2000000
>>> > >>>>>  frame-relay interface-dlci 205 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>>  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 222 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 502 ppp Virtual-Template1  frame-relay
>>> > >>>>> interface-dlci 555 ppp Virtual-Template1 end
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> R2(config-if)#
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Danny Alvarez Uribe <
>>> > >>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> > Thanks man. Then perhaps it's because the clock rate statement
>>> > >>>>> > is configured on both ends? Can you post the '"show interface"
>>> > >>>>> > from
>>> > >>>>> each side?
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:09 AM, rauenpc . <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> >> Being PPPoFR, the serial link needs to remain with
>>> > >>>>> >> encapsulation frame-relay. The only way to configure "ppp
>>> > multilink group 1"
>>> > >>>>> would be to
>>> > >>>>> >> first set the encapsulation to ppp on the serial interface.
>>> > >>>>> >>
>>> > >>>>> >>
>>> > >>>>> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Danny Alvarez Uribe <
>>> > >>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> > >>>>> >>
>>> > >>>>> >>> Shouldn't  Serial0/2/0 also be on ppp multilink group 1 ?
>>> > >>>>> >>>
>>> > >>>>> >>> - Danny
>>> > >>>>> >>>
>>> > >>>>> >>
>>> > >>>>> >>
>>> > >>>>> >
>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security
>>> > >>>>> Videos
>>> > >>>>> ::
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos
>>> ::
>>> >
>>> > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > Anheuser-Busch InBev Email Disclaimer www.ab-inbev.com
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>
>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to