Whoops, you meant configuration section and not TS.

For configuration, a quick show run on all devices should help, especially on 
the 3560s.
Remember dependencies for things to work: Ip routing for switches, ipv6 unicast 
routing for ipv6, ip cef, I always check for any type of ACL... MACL, VACL, etc.


Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 21, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Ryan Krcelic <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> They love to disable CEF and the ask you to use features that require CEF. 
> This May or may not be one of the faults as they may be testing to see if you 
> know to turn it on. I read somewhere that some people go ahead and enable it 
> everywhere. Read the test carefully to make sure this doesn't violate the 
> rules
> 
> On my first attempt I thought I found them all and then got stuck when 
> something simple wasn't working. Took me a while to find it and a lot of time 
> was wasted. Keep the configuration faults in the back of your mind if 
> something like that happens and try to trace things out end to end.
> 
> Respectfully,
> 
> Ryan Krcelic
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 21, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> This is what I did only on my third attempt and finally passed.
>> 
>> Each ticket, take 2 minutes to find the FAULT (note: not solve).  If you 
>> don't find the FAULT within 2 minutes, move to the next ticket.  Keep 
>> cycling through tickets until you find faults.  Then take 3-4 minutes to 
>> solve.  Again, after 3 minutes- move on.  Keep cycling through, rinse, 
>> repeat.  I also skipped tickets that were larger point values on my first 
>> cycle through.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Dec 21, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I always just went through a checked all the interface IPs and masks (seem
>>> to be a common place to inject a fault) and also look for some other things
>>> that would typically be a mistake in the lab like "no ip cef" or "no ip
>>> routing".
>>> 
>>> On my second (successful) attempt, I only found one of two after about 15
>>> minutes so I had to move on. I did find what I'm very confident was the
>>> injected fault a little later on when a feature wasn't working.
>>> 
>>> I guess my strategy was to do a really fast first pass to check the most
>>> likely things, and then after 15 mins just trust that I'd find the other
>>> one as I went. Those were my least-favorite tasks, since it was basically
>>> impossible to *know* that you completed the task correctly.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Donald Robb <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> My take is that generally the first thing I do when starting a lab is read
>>>> through the exam then verify basic connectivity between Routers on a
>>>> segment
>>>> while I'm at it I check the IP address and mask  against the diagram. Also
>>>> I
>>>> verify the vlan assignments, vtp status/password, and check trunk links.
>>>> 
>>>> It'll probably take you 15-20 min but you'll probably find most if not all
>>>> the errors and also have a good feel for the network as well as have
>>>> confidence that there is not any hardware faults etc.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Donald Robb
>>>> Productive Networks / Network Consultant
>>>> 
>>>> CCIE Written, CCIP, CCSP, CCDP, CCNP: R&S/Security, CCNA: Voice, JNCIP,
>>>> SCP,
>>>> MCSA 2012, VCA-DCV, CCA: XenApp 6, Security+, CCSE.R65, PACE
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mills, Derek
>>>> (NAZ-V)
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 8:18 AM
>>>> To: '[email protected]'
>>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Finding pre-configured faults...
>>>> 
>>>> I'm curious to hear what the group's strategy is on finding pre-configured
>>>> faults. I find that I can waste a lot of time if I go searching for them.
>>>> On
>>>> the other hand, by virtue of configuring the tasks in the lab I seem to
>>>> inevitably find the faults when troubleshooting a task configuration later.
>>>> Usually, they are the first or second thing you check when you don't have
>>>> reachability or when a EIGRP neighbor won't come up, for example. They
>>>> really don't end up costing me time because I find them fast when
>>>> troubleshooting a technology.
>>>> 
>>>> What is your take on it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>> Anheuser-Busch InBev Email Disclaimer www.ab-inbev.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>> 
>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>> 
>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>> 
>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>> _______________________________________________
>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>> 
>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to