Taking my lab next Friday. I've looked at a lot of posts on here, I've been labbing a lot. I'm still studying. I feel like I'm very good, and my speed has increased. I'm still quite nervous. I hope I can interpret everything in the lab. I've learned that this is a key skill for the lab.
> From: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 99, Issue 1 > To: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:00:08 -0400 > > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Bob McCouch) > 2. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Joe Sanchez) > 3. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Jim Newell) > 4. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Bob McCouch) > 5. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP Metric Weight.eml > (Joey) > 6. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight.eml (Jim Newell) > 7. VOL2 LAB2 (freddy morales) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:11:31 -0400 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Jim Newell <[email protected]> > Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > Message-ID: > <cajfuddyg-lvzfvzozw2mehasrgnfnomgj2tsvo4or8pxkyh...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Doc-CD is a good place to start: > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 > > Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco > IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP > Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always > > failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP > > process - something that should be easy points. I have searched > > unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and > > load > > are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable reference > > that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. > > > > Much appreciated > > Kind regards > > jpn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:27:54 -0500 > From: Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> > To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > Message-ID: > <cajvjoefkbnjjappnjhvf6ocq0tohwii20na27wd5zv9imgp...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Jim, > > Joe Astorino did a blog on this a while back. Although one of his metrics > is off, it should answer any of your questions. If not, as mentioned the > Doc-CD? and Ivan' book should be good. > > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ > > Joe Sanchez > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Doc-CD is a good place to start: > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 > > > > Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco > > IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP > > Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always > > > failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP > > > process - something that should be easy points. I have searched > > > unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and > > > load > > > are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable > > reference > > > that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. > > > > > > Much appreciated > > > Kind regards > > > jpn > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > _______________________________________________ > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:43:47 -0400 > From: "Jim Newell" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Thanks Bob. I navigated to that link yesterday while trying to complete a task > and looked at the items listed in table 1 and the items in table 2 and made an > assumption that they should be matched up according to the listed order. When > checking the proposed solution later I had one value in the wrong location. > > Requirement was to use delay, load and bandwidth: > My solution: metric weights 0 1 0 1 1 0 > Proposed solution: metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0 > > I have run into issues with this topic before, so it may just be that I am > missing something obvious > > Much appreciated > Kind regards > jpn > > ------ Original Message ------ > Received: 12:12 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Jim Newell <[email protected]>Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > > Doc-CD is a good place to start: > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 > > Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco > IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP > Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always > > failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP > > process - something that should be easy points. I have searched > > unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and > > load > > are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable reference > > that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. > > > > Much appreciated > > Kind regards > > jpn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:04:44 -0400 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Jim Newell <[email protected]> > Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > Message-ID: > <CAJFuDdZuu59A1KeCM9usC6i16Xo-dkMGpqL03=6kuf8f8xe...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi Jim, > > The formula is right above table 1: > > EIGRP composite cost metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256 - Load) + > (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4))) > > So your solution (ignoring the leading 0, which off the top of my head I > forget the significance of -- maybe that's the magic new K they added in > recent code), would use BW, Delay, and then 0/Reliability+1, which clearly > wouldn't do much for you. Off hand, I forget if IOS just ignores K4 if K5 > is not also set, but you'd kind of think it would need to so as to avoid a > divide-by-zero error. > > I always remember that the default is "10100" because it looks like 10/100 > as in a switch port. So obviously positions 1 & 3 (K1, and K3) rep the > default weighted values of BW and Delay. I'd look up anything else, as the > consequences are huge to forgetting which on is reliability and which one > is load (as you've observed). > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Bob. I navigated to that link yesterday while trying to complete a > > task > > and looked at the items listed in table 1 and the items in table 2 and > > made an > > assumption that they should be matched up according to the listed order. > > When > > checking the proposed solution later I had one value in the wrong location. > > > > Requirement was to use delay, load and bandwidth: > > My solution: metric weights 0 1 0 1 1 0 > > Proposed solution: metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0 > > > > I have run into issues with this topic before, so it may just be that I am > > missing something obvious > > > > Much appreciated > > Kind regards > > jpn > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > Received: 12:12 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 > > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > > To: Jim Newell <[email protected]>Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight > > > > Doc-CD is a good place to start: > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 > > > > Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco > > IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP > > Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always > > > failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP > > > process - something that should be easy points. I have searched > > > unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and > > > load > > > are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable > > reference > > > that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. > > > > > > Much appreciated > > > Kind regards > > > jpn > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:57:18 -0600 > From: Joey <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP > Metric Weight.eml > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Jim, > > This blog post really cleared things up for me. > > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ > > On 03/31/2014 10:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:28:35 -0400 > From: "Jim Newell" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Yes, I had read through that post when this issue came up in the past. For > some reason I did not catch the reference to K1=BW, etc. Based on what I see > the information appears to be accurate. I am going to go back and find all > references to metric weights in the workbooks and see if it holds true in all > cases. > > Thanks All for the replies. > > Kind regards > jpn > > ------ Original Message ------ > Received: 03:01 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 > From: Joey <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP Metric > Weight.eml > > Jim, > > This blog post really cleared things up for me. > > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ > > On 03/31/2014 10:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 14:14:03 +0000 > From: freddy morales <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL2 LAB2 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > > > > > > Hi, I have a question about task 10.2. The task says to drop any p2p > traffic form VLANC. What I did is that I reused the policy I had applied to > the > frame relay outbound interface from a previous task and drop p2p traffic > there. > > > But when looking at the solutions I see that the person who solved it > configured a different policy map and applied it inbound on the lan > interface. > Probably the best way to do it is applying it on the lan interface but does > it > make a difference for the ccie lab since the question doesn?t specify > specifically to do it inbound or outbound? > > Thanks! > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 99, Issue 1 > ************************************** _______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
