Good luck. Regards, Joe Sanchez
( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) > On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Kenyone Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Taking my lab next Friday. > > I've looked at a lot of posts on here, I've been labbing a lot. I'm still > studying. I feel like I'm very good, and my speed has increased. I'm still > quite nervous. I hope I can interpret everything in the lab. I've learned > that this is a key skill for the lab. > >> From: [email protected] >> Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 99, Issue 1 >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:00:08 -0400 >> >> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Bob McCouch) >> 2. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Joe Sanchez) >> 3. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Jim Newell) >> 4. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight (Bob McCouch) >> 5. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP Metric Weight.eml >> (Joey) >> 6. Re: EIGRP Metric Weight.eml (Jim Newell) >> 7. VOL2 LAB2 (freddy morales) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:11:31 -0400 >> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> To: Jim Newell <[email protected]> >> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >> Message-ID: >> <cajfuddyg-lvzfvzozw2mehasrgnfnomgj2tsvo4or8pxkyh...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Doc-CD is a good place to start: >> >> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 >> >> Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco >> IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP >> Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always >>> failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP >>> process - something that should be easy points. I have searched >>> unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and >>> load >>> are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable reference >>> that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. >>> >>> Much appreciated >>> Kind regards >>> jpn >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>> >>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:27:54 -0500 >> From: Joe Sanchez <[email protected]> >> To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >> Message-ID: >> <cajvjoefkbnjjappnjhvf6ocq0tohwii20na27wd5zv9imgp...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Jim, >> >> Joe Astorino did a blog on this a while back. Although one of his metrics >> is off, it should answer any of your questions. If not, as mentioned the >> Doc-CD? and Ivan' book should be good. >> >> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ >> >> Joe Sanchez >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Doc-CD is a good place to start: >>> >>> >>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 >>> >>> Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco >>> IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP >>> Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always >>>> failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP >>>> process - something that should be easy points. I have searched >>>> unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and >>>> load >>>> are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable >>> reference >>>> that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. >>>> >>>> Much appreciated >>>> Kind regards >>>> jpn >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>>> >>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>> >>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:43:47 -0400 >> From: "Jim Newell" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Thanks Bob. I navigated to that link yesterday while trying to complete a >> task >> and looked at the items listed in table 1 and the items in table 2 and made >> an >> assumption that they should be matched up according to the listed order. >> When >> checking the proposed solution later I had one value in the wrong location. >> >> Requirement was to use delay, load and bandwidth: >> My solution: metric weights 0 1 0 1 1 0 >> Proposed solution: metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0 >> >> I have run into issues with this topic before, so it may just be that I am >> missing something obvious >> >> Much appreciated >> Kind regards >> jpn >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> Received: 12:12 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 >> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> To: Jim Newell <[email protected]>Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >> >> Doc-CD is a good place to start: >> >> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 >> >> Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco >> IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP >> Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always >>> failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP >>> process - something that should be easy points. I have searched >>> unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and >>> load >>> are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable reference >>> that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. >>> >>> Much appreciated >>> Kind regards >>> jpn >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>> >>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:04:44 -0400 >> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> To: Jim Newell <[email protected]> >> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >> Message-ID: >> <CAJFuDdZuu59A1KeCM9usC6i16Xo-dkMGpqL03=6kuf8f8xe...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> The formula is right above table 1: >> >> EIGRP composite cost metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256 - Load) + >> (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4))) >> >> So your solution (ignoring the leading 0, which off the top of my head I >> forget the significance of -- maybe that's the magic new K they added in >> recent code), would use BW, Delay, and then 0/Reliability+1, which clearly >> wouldn't do much for you. Off hand, I forget if IOS just ignores K4 if K5 >> is not also set, but you'd kind of think it would need to so as to avoid a >> divide-by-zero error. >> >> I always remember that the default is "10100" because it looks like 10/100 >> as in a switch port. So obviously positions 1 & 3 (K1, and K3) rep the >> default weighted values of BW and Delay. I'd look up anything else, as the >> consequences are huge to forgetting which on is reliability and which one >> is load (as you've observed). >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Bob. I navigated to that link yesterday while trying to complete a >>> task >>> and looked at the items listed in table 1 and the items in table 2 and >>> made an >>> assumption that they should be matched up according to the listed order. >>> When >>> checking the proposed solution later I had one value in the wrong location. >>> >>> Requirement was to use delay, load and bandwidth: >>> My solution: metric weights 0 1 0 1 1 0 >>> Proposed solution: metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0 >>> >>> I have run into issues with this topic before, so it may just be that I am >>> missing something obvious >>> >>> Much appreciated >>> Kind regards >>> jpn >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> Received: 12:12 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 >>> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >>> To: Jim Newell <[email protected]>Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight >>> >>> Doc-CD is a good place to start: >>> >>> >>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_eigrp/configuration/15-mt/ire-15-mt-book/ire-enhanced-igrp.html#GUID-79D5B9EF-B4D4-4034-B275-347E866420C0 >>> >>> Support Home > Products > Cisco IOS and NX-OS Software > Cisco IOS > Cisco >>> IOS Software Release 15M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1M&T > Cisco IOS 15.1(4)M > IP >>> Routing: EIGRP Configuration Guide > EIGRP > EIGRP Cost Metrics >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jim Newell <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> I am not sure anyone else has had this same issue. I find myself always >>>> failing tasks that require adjusting the metric weights under the EIGRP >>>> process - something that should be easy points. I have searched >>>> unsuccessfully for a good reference that shows how bandwidth, delay and >>>> load >>>> are mapped to values K1, K2, etc. If anyone has a good, reliable >>> reference >>>> that clears this up can you kindly point me to it. >>>> >>>> Much appreciated >>>> Kind regards >>>> jpn >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>>> >>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>> >>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:57:18 -0600 >> From: Joey <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP >> Metric Weight.eml >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Jim, >> >> This blog post really cleared things up for me. >> >> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ >> >>> On 03/31/2014 10:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:28:35 -0400 >> From: "Jim Newell" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Yes, I had read through that post when this issue came up in the past. For >> some reason I did not catch the reference to K1=BW, etc. Based on what I see >> the information appears to be accurate. I am going to go back and find all >> references to metric weights in the workbooks and see if it holds true in all >> cases. >> >> Thanks All for the replies. >> >> Kind regards >> jpn >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> Received: 03:01 PM EDT, 03/31/2014 >> From: Joey <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9 EIGRP Metric >> Weight.eml >> >> Jim, >> >> This blog post really cleared things up for me. >> >> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/03/03/eigrp-metric-k-values/ >> >>> On 03/31/2014 10:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Metric Weight.eml >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >> >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 14:14:03 +0000 >> From: freddy morales <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL2 LAB2 >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, I have a question about task 10.2. The task says to drop any p2p >> traffic form VLANC. What I did is that I reused the policy I had applied to >> the >> frame relay outbound interface from a previous task and drop p2p traffic >> there. >> >> >> But when looking at the solutions I see that the person who solved it >> configured a different policy map and applied it inbound on the lan >> interface. >> Probably the best way to do it is applying it on the lan interface but does >> it >> make a difference for the ccie lab since the question doesn?t specify >> specifically to do it inbound or outbound? >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >> >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >> >> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 99, Issue 1 >> ************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc _______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
