Thanks Scott,

That is what I wanted to know. I thought so too, but your confirmation adds
to my confidence.

I do see the ccm-manager music-on-hold stats, but I have not configured any
moh source under call-manager-fallback so why do i see the stats?

Is the router acting up and picking up old configs (for which I did have moh
configured), may be it needs a reboot???

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Correct. I was just answering his initial question regarding the perfmon
> counters.
>
> you can also run 'debug ephone moh'
>
>   On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Right, but that does not prove it is working, the show ccm music will
> > prove it tho...
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > If you configure your branch router to source Multicast MoH via SRST,
> > you
> > > should still see the MoH perfmon counters increase even though the MoH
> > is
> > > not traversing the WAN.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:53 AM, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Should I see my perf mon counters increase when i am using remote
> > site
> > > router as the moh source.
> > > >
> > > > Here is how I am trying to isolate.
> > > >
> > > > I have multicast-routing disabled on the wan interfaces (no ip pim
> > > dense-mode)
> > > >
> > > > My MOH server source hop count is set to 1.
> > > >
> > > > Remote Site MRG is set to use Multicast MOH on callmanager
> > configuration.
> > > >
> > > > I have no moh configured on the remote site router, but I do see my
> > > Perfmon counters increase.
> > > >
> > > > should the end result be no MOH??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
> > > binary, and those who don't"
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
> binary, and those who don't"
>

Reply via email to