Do you have "max-reserved-bandwidth 100" in you serial interface?
If so, you need to either change this to 95%
Or try to create class-map for routing updates.
You may be running out of bandwidth.
Normally, fair-que on the class default should work.
/Jin Jung...
sean hurricane wrote:
update:
Removed QOS config from the interface and what do you know, it did the
same, Anyone else seeing this?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:19 AM,
<ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>> wrote:
Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>
You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Workbook version 3 lab6 and 10 (sean hurricane)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:25:44 -0400
From: sean hurricane <shurric...@gmail.com
<mailto:shurric...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook version 3 lab6 and 10
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Message-ID:
<29604bef0904082225q176a37a5k9e5dbf8e412dd...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:29604bef0904082225q176a37a5k9e5dbf8e412dd...@mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In these two labs we were asked to configured SIP trunk over the
WAN and QOS
sections asks to allow 4 G729 calls across the WAN, since the
codec for SIP
trunks has to be G711ulaw, this does not allow enough bandwidth.
my priority
statements are set at 103 for regular frame and 109 for frame
relay with
FRF.12. The calls goes through successfully and supplementary
services work
but while on the call, my ospf neighbor relationship resets and
re-establish
and phones reset especially site B. i have compared with solution will
ipexpert's solution and its the same. is anyone else seeing this?
Vik or
mark can you chime in?
