I like E164 and standard-local-route-groups.

Assuming that you have used the line/device method for granting permissions
on who dials where.

For outgoing calls :

Create translation patterns to get local branch plan --> E164 (with a + at
the front). These will be site specific so people in the US can dial 9011
for international it drops the 9011 and replaces with a +  in the UK 900
again would be replaced with a + in france 000 again replaced with a +

Then create outgoing called/calling translations specific to the gateway.
In this way if gateway HQ-RTR is given a calling no of +16178631002 and a
called no of +12123945002 it will know how to process these numbers so they
are locally recognised by the PSTN at this point.

In the case of the calling no it would drop the + and set the type and
national. (there is nothing to say the telco will accept this info
especially if you set type to international)
In the case of the called no it would drop the +1212 and set the type to
subscriber. (I¹m not sure if it would just drop the +1 ???)

Now back to the local route groups ... Associate rg-hq with device pool HQ
and rg-br1 with device-pool BR1

If your route-patterns consist of :

\+1212xxxxxxxx --> rl-hq-teho (which contains rg-hq, local-route-group)
\+1617xxxxxxxx --> rl-br1-teho (which contains rg-br1, local-route-group)
\+! --> rl-gk (something for other targets ...)

Basically I created a single partition pt-e164 with all the + dial patterns
in it. Teho works auto-magically because it¹s a more specific path.

In fact using the AAR also becomes easy as you make all the external numbers
their full E164 number without the +, you then create a single AAR group for
everyone with + in it.
You create a single css (css-aar) containing a single partition (pt-aar)
You create a  single route pattern  \+! in partition pt-aar which points at
a route-list containing your local-route-group followed by say head office
as backup.
Set the service parameters and AAR works for the cluster ;-)

For incoming calls:

Generate the full E164 number from the subscriber/national/international
fields 
Using the device profile incoming CSS translations you can localise what the
phone displays (ie drop the plus and add a 9).

It took me a while to get my head around where you do what as there¹s too
many options but once it clicks it¹s quite straight forward.

To show how flexible this is I made my BR2 another branch paris. To make
this work cleanly I added country specific translations for the site (0.00
--> + instead of 9.011), a new set of country specific pt¹s were needed for
outgoing permissions ‹ but that was about it. Because the number is
globalised even a call from the BR2 (paris) extn to a HQ local number works.

I believe the reason Cisco is doing this is to make CUCM more scalable ‹ I
noted in the docs that if you use the default inter/intra codec and QoS
settings from the service parameters they increase the max locations from
1000 to 2000. Whilst initially making the whole process a tad more
complicated I can see how this reduces the size of the dialplan.

--- due to my lack of sleep in the last few days I will apologise up front
for the typos ‹ etc.

Best regards

Mick

E: m...@pobox.net.uk




From: ccie8340tx <ccie834...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:46:15 -0500
To: Brian Valentine <bkvalent...@gmail.com>, 'Kevin Damisch'
<kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com>, <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 11 digit local and LD issue

Brian,
 
how can you predict which area code prefix is going to be called and which
prefix to add for each of the local called numbers ?. its quite possible the
last 7 digits could be available in 1 or more area codes that are local
...Thoughts??
 
Cheers,Padhu
 
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
>  
> From:  Brian  Valentine <mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com>
>  
> To: 'Kevin Damisch' <mailto:kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com>  ;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>  
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:51  PM
>  
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 11 digit  local and LD issue
>  
> 
>  
>  
> 
> Well, I¹ll admit that local  route groups is not one of my strengths.  I
> haven¹t used them yet, and  I¹m not yet convinced that they will be very
> useful in a production  environment.   Having said that, I¹ll tell you have
> that I have  configured this exact setup (but without local route groups) for
> a  client.  It was actually quite easy.
>  
>  
>  
> Put the seven digit patterns  in the ³Local² partition (9.[2-9]XXXXXX).  Put
> the ³11² digit pattern in  the ³Long Distance²
> partition(9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX).  Same as normal.    The only difference is
> that when we send the local call, we strip  predot and then prefix 1XXX (where
> XXX is the local area code).    So, if the local area code were 408,  and
> someone who has the CSS with  the local partion in it dials the local number
> 95551212, we would send it out  to the telco as 14085551212.  If they dial
> 914085551212, but they don¹t  have the LD partition in their CSS, the call
> would fail.
>  
>  
>  
> Now, couldn¹t you do that  using local route groups? I would imagine it would
> work if the gateways were  H.323. Just make the translation in the dialpeer
> instead of in the  callmanager.
>  
>  
>  
> Am I way  off?
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> From:  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kevin  Damisch
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:06 AM
> To:  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 11 digit  local and LD issue
>  
>  
>  
> This isn¹t from the workbooks, but hopefully good  discussion.  If you are
> designing a dial plan where the PSTN requires 11  digits for both local and
> LD, what have some of you done to apply calling  restrictions so that certain
> phones (lobby, breakroom, etc.) can only dial  local calls.  We don¹t want to
> use any long distance access codes such as  FAC or PSTN codes.  We are looking
> at using the Line/Device approach with  local route groups.  The only way I
> see it is to know of every area  code/prefix that is considered local to that
> site, then create route patterns  based off of those.  This would be tedious
> work as new prefixes could get  added and you may not know about them.
>  
>  
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Kevin
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
> 
> This  communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
> of the  individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information  that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable  law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,
> distribution or  copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received  this communication in error, please notify Vital Support
> Systems at 515 334  5700 and delete or destroy all copies and the original
> document.
>  
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information  regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to