The winner is Chris Parker who gave me the clarification:

The policed-dscp wil only remark packets that already had dscp 24 to dscp 8. 
The second one will remark all traffic to 8 if it exceeds the policed rate.
Thanks,
Kevin


________________________________
From: Brett [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:03 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: Kevin Damisch; Nizar JAFRI; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

Agreed. And I'm not positive, but I don't believe you'll see the 
set-dscp-transmit option on a 3750 unless it is a Metro E class switch.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Aamir Panjwani 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Both methods looks same to me, but I generally do option 1 as recommended in 
SRND and ipexpert labs




-----Original Message-----
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Kevin Damisch
Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 2:20 AM
To: Nizar JAFRI; 'Jonathan Charles'
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

What is the difference between these 2 scenarios:

mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8
police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit


police 32000 8000 exceed-action set-dscp-transmit 8

Would both of these take the excess SCCP traffic (assuming you have your ACLs 
or maps correct) down to DSCP 8?  And, I don't see "set-dscp-transmit" anywhere 
in the QoS or CUCM SRNDs, only "policed-dscp-transmit".

Thanks,
Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Nizar JAFRI
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 5:27 PM
To: 'Jonathan Charles'
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

Thanks jonathan, I have an example:

Limit the SCCP traffic to 32k per endpoint, overloads should be marked down
to AF11

The answer is: police 320000 8000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
set-dscp-transmit af11.

Why the burst size is 8000, is this a default value?? Also in SNRD, police
in auto qos for switching use the same value.

Best regards.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jonathan Charles [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Envoyé : samedi 5 septembre 2009 18:42
À : Nizar JAFRI
Cc : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TR: Auto qos voip SNRD

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
0a3a25.shtml<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml>

It helps to understand how frame-relay works.... same basic principle...


Jonathan

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jonathan 
Charles<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You can use whatever commands you want in the lab... if you think they
> will help...
>
> The first number is the max-rate... the second is the burst size... go
> check out the token bucket process and you will see how it all
> works...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Nizar 
> JAFRI<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> On the QOS SRND, Catalyst configuration.  I found some commands like
this:
>> police 128000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can someone explain, why the second parameter don't change, even though
the
>> rate changes??
>>
>> Please let me know if we can use auto qos on the real LAB??
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>>
>>
>

__________ NOD32 4398 (20090905) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com<http://www.eset.com/>


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>

This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and 
delete or destroy all copies and the original document.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>


________________________________
This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and 
delete or destroy all copies and the original document.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to