Perfect, so in a given scenario wher I have to assign particular percent of BW and PQ to be Q1 the solution discussed here should work. Let me lab it and update.
thx Angel and Roger.... On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Roger Henderson <rhender...@gmail.com>wrote: > Priority-queue out sets port 1 on the egress to be the priority queue. Only > queue 1 can be an egress priority queue on the 3750. > > Roger > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thx for your kind clarification, now if I have to also enable PQ will I >> have to enable "priority-queue out" on the interface but in that case Q1 >> will still be the PQ or there will be one more Q assigned but I think the >> port only has 4 egress Qs ? >> >> >> 2010/4/29 Angel Perez <gorr...@hotmail.com> >> >>> Hi, when you set "1" in share like "share 1 x x x" you are telling the >>> switch to take the shape value for this queue, 33% in the previous example >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:24 -0700 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >>> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >>> To: rhender...@gmail.com >>> CC: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> >>> >>> Appreciate your reply on this... have some doubt ... >>> >>> ******you have assigned shape 3 for Q1 and Share 1 for Q1 - so in this >>> case why we need to have 1 on share ? >>> >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! Q1 >>> is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >>> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5 >>> >>> >>> *********Also the second statement shd be "share 1 70 25 0" instead of >>> share "1 70 25 1" right pls ?? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson >>> <rhender...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>> Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which >>> replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios. >>> >>> Roger >>> >>> 2010/4/29 Angel Perez <gorr...@hotmail.com> >>> >>> From QoS Entreprise 3.3 >>> >>> Campus QoS Design chapter: >>> >>> >>> >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 ! >>> Q1 is limited to 1/3 of the total available BW >>> CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2 >>> gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5% >>> shape 3 0 0 0 = 1/3 0 0 0 = 33% 0 0 0 >>> share 1 70 25 0 = 1 take shape 70% 25% 0% from remaining >>> >>> hth >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:43:34 -0700 >>> From: vccie2...@gmail.com >>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on switch >>> >>> >>> little correction .pls... >>> >>> >>> If I want Q1 to get 33 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 48% and Q4 7% >>> >>> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >>> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:41 PM, vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If I want Q1 to get 25 % BW, Q2 20%, Q3 40% and Q4 40% >>> >>> srr-queue bandwidth share 25 20 48 7 >>> srr-queue bandwidth shaped 33 0 0 0 >>> >>> As Shape takes precedence over Shared and if we set Shape to 0 for that >>> value, Share BW will be applied. Not sure if the above solution work ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >>> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it >>> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
