"no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update" doesn't seem to help.
I had an epiphany and figured out a work around to accomplish the task. What the PG suggests seems to work fine, but only on an MGCP gateway. I had to build an additional dial-peer in my BR1 gw with destination-pattern 415888.... (forward digits 7). So, from CUCMs perspective, it sends the gateway 4158884343. If I do the manipulation on the H323 gateway, it works. HQ Phone 2 will basically send whatever CUCM sends an H323 gateway. Maybe there is a service param somewhere? Brian On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Matthew Berry <ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Voice service voip > No supplementary-service h225-notify CID-update > > > Matthew Berry > > **Sent from my iPhone** > Skype/Twitter: ciscovoiceguru > Google Voice: +1 612 424 5044 > > On Jul 23, 2010, at 12:31, Brian Valentine <bkvalent...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm working on Vol2 Lab7 Task2.4. The task involves the following: >> >> HQ phone 2 dials 914158884343. >> Prefer to use TEHO to route the call out BR1. Local telco expects 7 >> digits. BR1 is an H323 gateway, so CUCM sends it 98884343. The >> gateway strips the 9 before sending to telco. >> Second choice gateway is the HQ gateway, which is MGCP. Local telco >> will expect 11 digits. CUCM would send the gateway 14158884343. >> Regardless of which gateway the call goes out the HQ Phone 2 display >> should say: "To 4158884343". >> >> Got the call routing and redundancy down fine. That's works well >> enough. The problem is that no matter what I do, it seems to convert >> the display on HQ Phone 2 to match whatever digit manipulation was >> required by the egress gateway. The proctor guide says: "The display >> on the Calling phone will be derived from the Route Pattern >> manipulation although the actual digits the UCM sends to the gateway >> is determined by the Route List/Route Group Called # transformations". >> So, I tried that. I tried doing all my digit manipulation on the RL >> details level and use the XXXXXXXXXX as the Called Party >> transformation on the Route Pattern level. Call goes through, but the >> HQ Phone 2 still displays "To: 98884343". >> >> Next I tried setting the RL details to leave it as 415888XXXX and used >> a Called Party Transformation Pattern at the gateway level to convert >> the call. I got the same result. Call succeeds. The display on HQ >> Phone 2 shows "To: 98884343". What am I missing? Is this task >> possible? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Brian >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
