When interpreting SDI traces and you see "NoPotentialMatchesExist" it's
a bit misleading.  What it actually means is "no more" potential matches
exist and the Digit Analysis process is complete and has made a match.  

Warren

Warren Heaviside    wheav...@cisco.com
ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT
High Touch Technical Support
Phone: +1 408 853 7995
Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


-----Original Message-----
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 1:41 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 95

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
        ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: GateKeeper Problems (ccieid1ot)
   2. Re: GateKeeper Problems (Pavan)
   3. Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28,   1600 hours EST)
      (David Lee)
   4. Re: Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28,       1600 hours EST)
      (David Lee)
   5. proctor lab down ??? (Erwan Erwan)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:12:15 -0500
From: ccieid1ot <ccieid...@gmail.com>
To: Josmar Ramirez <jrami...@ccsinet.com>
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,
        ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
Message-ID:
        <aanlktimvnzvdwu+o_hcp0-j57hfgjgqssexs4gwoq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Yes, digit manipulation or sig dig 4.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Josmar Ramirez
<jrami...@ccsinet.com>wrote:

> Of course I meant on the incoming digits on the ccm trunck
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Josmar Ramirez
> To: 'edot...@ams.net' <edot...@ams.net>; 'pav.c...@gmail.com' <
> pav.c...@gmail.com>; 'ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com' <
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>; 'dcrayto...@comcast.net' <
> dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
>  Sent: Fri Aug 27 22:39:20 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
>
> On the callmanager make sure you set the significant digits to 4 so
that it
> strips the 1# when it hits the trunk on ccm. Careful this might break
any
> teho config that you might be sending to ccm.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> To: Pavan <pav.c...@gmail.com>; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
<
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>; dcrayto...@comcast.net <
> dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Sent: Fri Aug 27 21:55:40 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
>
> Are you doing any digit translation to remove the prefix. That was
tripping
> me up.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavan <pav.c...@gmail.com>
> Sender: <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:19:04
> To: dcrayto...@comcast.net<dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/e8fb1298/attachment-0001.html
>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:25:46 -0500
From: Pavan <pav.c...@gmail.com>
To: DeShon Crayton <dcrayto...@gmail.com>
Cc: "ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com"
        <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>,
        "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
<ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
Message-ID: <0bb72b5d-bb5d-4a38-a909-44eabddf6...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Well looks like either the css did not take effect(i.e. No reset issued
after change) or no tp exists.
Can you post the complete da signals.
The little bit you posted doesnt help.

On Aug 28, 2010, at 9:29 AM, DeShon Crayton <dcrayto...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have included ccm and sdl traces.
>  
>  
> I see that no matches are found:
>  
> Fqdn=pi=0si1 Cgpn=tn=0npi=0nd=3003pi=1si0
DialedNum=tn=0npi=0nd=1#5004pi=0si1 requestID=0
DigitAnalysisComplexity=0
> 
> 000004710| 2010/08/28 08:50:01.090| 002| SdlSig | DaRes | setup_da |
Cdcc(2,100,171,6) | Da(2,100,164,1) | (0,0,0,0).0-(*:10.10.3.1) | [R:NP
- HP: 0, NP: 0, LP: 0, VLP: 0, LZP: 0 DBP: 0]CI=48500372 Block
NoPotentialMatchesExist OnNetrequestID =0
> 
> My trunk has a CSS that has access to a partition with a translation
pattern that strips the 1#.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Josmar Ramirez
<jrami...@ccsinet.com> wrote:
> Of course I meant on the incoming digits on the ccm trunck
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Josmar Ramirez
> To: 'edot...@ams.net' <edot...@ams.net>; 'pav.c...@gmail.com'
<pav.c...@gmail.com>; 'ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com'
<ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>; 'dcrayto...@comcast.net'
<dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Sent: Fri Aug 27 22:39:20 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
> 
> On the callmanager make sure you set the significant digits to 4 so
that it strips the 1# when it hits the trunk on ccm. Careful this might
break any teho config that you might be sending to ccm.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
<ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> To: Pavan <pav.c...@gmail.com>; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
<ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>; dcrayto...@comcast.net
<dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Sent: Fri Aug 27 21:55:40 2010
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
> 
> Are you doing any digit translation to remove the prefix. That was
tripping me up.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavan <pav.c...@gmail.com>
> Sender: <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:19:04
> To: dcrayto...@comcast.net<dcrayto...@comcast.net>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GateKeeper Problems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> <ccm00000001.txt>
> <SDL002_100_000098.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/dd14f364/attachment-0001.html
>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:04:43 -0400
From: David Lee <d16...@gmail.com>
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28,
        1600 hours EST)
Message-ID:
        <aanlktinqrhzpogsmseqjabovnrzat1p6gp6dpulj8...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

It's not working for me?  Anyone else affected?  Any PL support online?

Thanks,

-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/d8e80252/attachment-0001.html
>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:11:05 -0400
From: David Lee <d16...@gmail.com>
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug
        28,     1600 hours EST)
Message-ID:
        <aanlktim=5mr1hvhwk+8=uz3t5-5j984_e7vr+jzhy...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

It's back up now.  Many thanks to Andrew Shipton.

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:04 PM, David Lee <d16...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's not working for me?  Anyone else affected?  Any PL support
online?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/2d4c7046/attachment-0001.html
>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erwan Erwan <e_er...@yahoo.com>
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctor lab down ???
Message-ID: <644307.9876...@web120501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

anybody experience, is proctor lab down??


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
</archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100828/55a31515/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 54, Issue 95
******************************************
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to