Hi Ken, >From a lab perspective, I didn't find any difference between SJ and Brussels with respect to:
1. Speed 2. Ease of access 3. Proctors The only difference was that the phones in SJ are mounted on wooden boards, 4 on one side and 4 on the other so you can simply reach out and test. Phones in Brussels are placed one after the other in a long line so you have to get up and move around to perform testing. Given below are a few non-lab related pros and cons: SJ --- Pros: 1. Lightrail is an easy way to get around without waiting for transport for too long. 2. I stayed at the Vagabond Inn and that has a Denny's Diner attached. Always helpful if there is a 24X7 Diner next to the hotel. 3. Hotel is a 3 minute lightrail ride from the Cisco office. 4. Fisherman's Wharf 5. LA isn't too far away. Cons: 1. Food options are limited if you are a Vegetarian. 2. It's a bit dicey roaming around on the streets post 10 p.m. Brussels ------------ Pros: 1. Grand Place 2. Cafes' littered around the city are amazing 3. The Cisco office is walking distance (about a 20 minute walk) from the Hotel (Campanile) 4. Some places look like they are straight out of a fairy tale. 5. Paris is a 2 hour Thalys train ride away. Cons: 1. Everyone does not speak English 2. Pricey. On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:20 AM, <ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (John Smith) > 2. AAR into CUE CFA (Geoghegan, Stuart) > 3. Re: AAR into CUE CFA (Brian Mulgrew) > 4. Re: transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (Ken Wyan) > 5. Re: SJ vs RTP (Ken Wyan) > 6. Re: cRTP in nested CB traffic shaping policy (Abel ...) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT) > From: John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> > To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] transfer file to router with no tftp or > ftp server > Message-ID: > <1320429453.15669.yahoomail...@web125018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Forgive my ignorance, but if you needed to transfer a file from a PC to a > router and had no tftp server or ftp server on the PC, how could accomplish > that?? Thank you. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/507f3cec/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:59:41 +0000 > From: "Geoghegan, Stuart" <stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> > To: OSL <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR into CUE CFA > Message-ID: > <bbeca2fd86e3284785e0a95b247cb0480ef710a...@thor.bailey.pri> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi All > > I am working with my lab using a centralized dialplan an my BR2/Site-C > phones have CUE (integrated with CUCM). > > Everything works fine under Jtapi control and also using SIP when falling > back to SRST. > > If I call from HQ to Site-C when there is not enough bandwidth and AAR > kicks in, again this works fine with dialing between sites using globalized > numbering and AAR \+.! Route patterns. > > I can also allow the call from Hq-to Site-C phone forward-noan after the > timeout into CUE correctly and I can leave a message to the correct mailbox > (as the CTI Ports and Route Points are using the full External mask of the > CUE VM number). > > But, if I set the site C phone to CFA to CUE VM, when I dial using AAR > from another site - I get prompted for > > "Enter your Id following by hash" as if I was just dialling the Voicemail > Pilot instead of being redirected by the extension. . > > Has anyone experienced this before? Or is is expected behaviour? > > > kind regards > > Stuart Geoghegan > > > The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is > confidential. It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, > relied upon or used by any person other than the intended recipient. > Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and > postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently delete it and any attachments. > NG Bailey may monitor email where it is considered proportionate to any > perceived risk. This email has been sent on behalf of an NG Bailey company, > if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which company. The NG Bailey > companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey IT Services Limited > (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited (5472032), Kedington > (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey Group Limited > (1490238). All of the companies, except Kedington (Northern Ireland) > Limited, are registered in England with registered office at Denton Hall > Ilkley West Yorkshire LS29 0HH. Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited is > registered in Northern Ireland and its registered office is c/o Carson > McDowell, Murray House, Murray Street, Belfast, BT1 6DN. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/43a8025f/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 19:16:29 +0000 > From: Brian Mulgrew <btmulg...@gmail.com> > To: "Geoghegan, Stuart" <stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> > Cc: OSL <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR into CUE CFA > Message-ID: > <cabpd6gevz3gx_ofqmucwvcshfolwr2c_mvqs9no1ljbwtsd...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Hi Stuart - try checking redirecting number outbound on your HQ gateway - > if still an issue can you post a debug isdn q931 on hq and br2 gateways? > > hth > Brian > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Geoghegan, Stuart < > stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> wrote: > > > Hi All**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I am working with my lab using a centralized dialplan an my BR2/Site-C > > phones have CUE (integrated with CUCM).**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Everything works fine under Jtapi control and also using SIP when falling > > back to SRST.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > If I call from HQ to Site-C when there is not enough bandwidth and AAR > > kicks in, again this works fine with dialing between sites using > globalized > > numbering and AAR \+.! Route patterns.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I can also allow the call from Hq-to Site-C phone forward-noan after the > > timeout into CUE correctly and I can leave a message to the correct > mailbox > > (as the CTI Ports and Route Points are using the full External mask of > the > > CUE VM number). **** > > > > ** ** > > > > But, if I set the site C phone to CFA to CUE VM, when I dial using AAR > > from another site ? I get prompted for**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ?Enter your Id following by hash? as if I was just dialling the > Voicemail > > Pilot instead of being redirected by the extension. . **** > > > > ** ** > > > > Has anyone experienced this before? Or is is expected behaviour?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > kind regards**** > > > > **** > > > > Stuart Geoghegan > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is > > confidential. It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, > > relied upon or used by any person other than the intended recipient. > > Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you > have > > received this e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and > > postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently delete it and any > attachments. > > NG Bailey may monitor email where it is considered proportionate to any > > perceived risk. This email has been sent on behalf of an NG Bailey > company, > > if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which company. The NG Bailey > > companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey IT Services > Limited > > (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited (5472032), Kedington > > (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey Group Limited > > (1490238). All of the companies, except Kedington (Northern Ireland) > > Limited, are registered in England with registered office at Denton Hall > > Ilkley West Yorkshire LS29 0HH. Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited is > > registered in Northern Ireland and its registered office is c/o Carson > > McDowell, Murray House, Murray Street, Belfast, BT1 6DN. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/7b578f9e/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:13:30 +0530 > From: Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> > To: John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] transfer file to router with no tftp > or ftp server > Message-ID: > <CAPBg9BJswred27yO2ZZO2cTdymm=wtqv5x1ba1jegmxz+gp...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Configure Router as FTP server > > Check this. > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/11_3/feature/guide/ftpserve.html > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:27 PM, John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Forgive my ignorance, but if you needed to transfer a file from a PC to > > a router and had no tftp server or ftp server on the PC, how could > > accomplish that? Thank you. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111105/b621c14e/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:16:11 +0530 > From: Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> > To: "Abel ..." <midga...@gmail.com> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SJ vs RTP > Message-ID: > <capbg9bjbvdbrltfa_dknrmb9x8xtmsqzkqmchn5z6u8b5zv...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Can anybody compare Brussels with US locations (RTP,SJ) > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111105/b813330e/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:50:15 -0400 > From: "Abel ..." <midga...@gmail.com> > To: Nicolaers Luk <luk.nicola...@quentris-gdfsuez.be> > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cRTP in nested CB traffic shaping > policy > Message-ID: > <CAJ6s=ma7NguJWtTpLuZxEi9tDN5AjzdfF=gqkiiv6rv+nrt...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Can we see the class map for RTP Class? > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Nicolaers Luk < > luk.nicola...@quentris-gdfsuez.be> wrote: > > > Hi,**** > > > > **** > > > > I'm trying to setup CB traffic shaping with CRTP.**** > > > > This is the config of the policy maps:**** > > > > policy-map VOIP**** > > > > class RTP**** > > > > priority 28**** > > > > compress header ip rtp**** > > > > class SIG**** > > > > bandwidth 16**** > > > > **** > > > > policy-map shape**** > > > > class class-default**** > > > > shape average 365600 3656**** > > > > service-policy VOIP**** > > > > **** > > > > The policy-map shape is activated on the frame-relay map-class:**** > > > > map-class frame-relay toBR2**** > > > > frame-relay fragment 480**** > > > > service-policy output shape**** > > > > **** > > > > This is configured on the HQ router and the Branch office router**** > > > > When I make a call I can see that RTP traffic is matched but the rtp > > compression counters always remain at 0**** > > > > BRANCH#show policy-map interface serial 0/1/0.200**** > > > > Serial0/1/0.200: DLCI 200 -**** > > > > **** > > > > Service-policy output: shape**** > > > > **** > > > > Class-map: class-default (match-any)**** > > > > 403 packets, 27349 bytes**** > > > > 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps**** > > > > Match: any **** > > > > Queueing**** > > > > queue limit 64 packets**** > > > > (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0**** > > > > (pkts output/bytes output) 403/27349**** > > > > shape (average) cir 365600, bc 3656, be 3656**** > > > > target shape rate 365600**** > > > > lower bound cir 0, adapt to fecn 0**** > > > > **** > > > > Service-policy : VOIP**** > > > > **** > > > > queue stats for all priority classes:**** > > > > Queueing**** > > > > queue limit 64 packets**** > > > > (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0**** > > > > (pkts output/bytes output) 252/15834**** > > > > **** > > > > Class-map: RTP (match-any)**** > > > > 252 packets, 15834 bytes**** > > > > 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps**** > > > > Match: access-group name RTP**** > > > > 252 packets, 15834 bytes**** > > > > 5 minute rate 4000 bps**** > > > > Priority: 28 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0**** > > > > **** > > > > compress:**** > > > > header ip rtp**** > > > > UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)**** > > > > Sent: 0 total, 0 compressed, **** > > > > 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent**** > > > > rate 0 bps**** > > > > **** > > > > Anyone that has an idea why the compression counters remain at 0?**** > > > > **** > > > > Thanks**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Luk**** > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/33193748/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 12 > ****************************************** >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
