Hi Kshitij, I kinda disagree with you about Brussels... My first Lab attempt was there, and I don't remember walking around to test my phones. They were right in front of me, sitting on a L shaped desk. Everything was pretty comfy and speed was all right. I can't say anything about SJ, because I've never been to that Cisco site.
I was in a Hotel called NH Hotel, and that was a 5 minutes (tops) walking distance to the Cisco site. Everyone there spoke English, and at the airport too. Of course I would come up to them and ask first in French if they spoke English. I don't know Flamish, nor French. I speak only Portuguese and English, so... All of the people I came across spoke pretty good English. Even on Pizza Hut. Yes, Paris is 2 hours away. There are a few countries nearby, it's good to check out... I went as far as Brussels Nord and Wolwue. Very nice country. *Antonio Emanuel Damasceno* CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCNP Voice, CCIE Voice (written) CompTIA Network+ On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Kshitij Singhi <martinian.ksin...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Ken, > > From a lab perspective, I didn't find any difference between SJ and > Brussels with respect to: > > 1. Speed > 2. Ease of access > 3. Proctors > > The only difference was that the phones in SJ are mounted on wooden > boards, 4 on one side and 4 on the other so you can simply reach out and > test. Phones in Brussels are placed one after the other in a long line so > you have to get up and move around to perform testing. > > Given below are a few non-lab related pros and cons: > > SJ > --- > Pros: > > 1. Lightrail is an easy way to get around without waiting for transport > for too long. > 2. I stayed at the Vagabond Inn and that has a Denny's Diner attached. > Always helpful if there is a 24X7 Diner next to the hotel. > 3. Hotel is a 3 minute lightrail ride from the Cisco office. > 4. Fisherman's Wharf > 5. LA isn't too far away. > > Cons: > > 1. Food options are limited if you are a Vegetarian. > 2. It's a bit dicey roaming around on the streets post 10 p.m. > > Brussels > ------------ > > Pros: > > 1. Grand Place > 2. Cafes' littered around the city are amazing > 3. The Cisco office is walking distance (about a 20 minute walk) from the > Hotel (Campanile) > 4. Some places look like they are straight out of a fairy tale. > 5. Paris is a 2 hour Thalys train ride away. > > Cons: > > 1. Everyone does not speak English > 2. Pricey. > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:20 AM, <ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com>wrote: > >> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (John Smith) >> 2. AAR into CUE CFA (Geoghegan, Stuart) >> 3. Re: AAR into CUE CFA (Brian Mulgrew) >> 4. Re: transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (Ken Wyan) >> 5. Re: SJ vs RTP (Ken Wyan) >> 6. Re: cRTP in nested CB traffic shaping policy (Abel ...) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT) >> From: John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> >> To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] transfer file to router with no tftp or >> ftp server >> Message-ID: >> <1320429453.15669.yahoomail...@web125018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Forgive my ignorance, but if you needed to transfer a file from a PC to a >> router and had no tftp server or ftp server on the PC, how could accomplish >> that?? Thank you. >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/507f3cec/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:59:41 +0000 >> From: "Geoghegan, Stuart" <stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> >> To: OSL <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR into CUE CFA >> Message-ID: >> <bbeca2fd86e3284785e0a95b247cb0480ef710a...@thor.bailey.pri> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hi All >> >> I am working with my lab using a centralized dialplan an my BR2/Site-C >> phones have CUE (integrated with CUCM). >> >> Everything works fine under Jtapi control and also using SIP when falling >> back to SRST. >> >> If I call from HQ to Site-C when there is not enough bandwidth and AAR >> kicks in, again this works fine with dialing between sites using globalized >> numbering and AAR \+.! Route patterns. >> >> I can also allow the call from Hq-to Site-C phone forward-noan after the >> timeout into CUE correctly and I can leave a message to the correct mailbox >> (as the CTI Ports and Route Points are using the full External mask of the >> CUE VM number). >> >> But, if I set the site C phone to CFA to CUE VM, when I dial using AAR >> from another site - I get prompted for >> >> "Enter your Id following by hash" as if I was just dialling the >> Voicemail Pilot instead of being redirected by the extension. . >> >> Has anyone experienced this before? Or is is expected behaviour? >> >> >> kind regards >> >> Stuart Geoghegan >> >> >> The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is >> confidential. It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, >> relied upon or used by any person other than the intended recipient. >> Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and >> postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently delete it and any >> attachments. NG Bailey may monitor email where it is considered >> proportionate to any perceived risk. This email has been sent on behalf of >> an NG Bailey company, if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which company. >> The NG Bailey companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey IT >> Services Limited (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited >> (5472032), Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey >> Group Limited (1490238). All of the companies, except Kedington (Northern >> Ireland) Limited, are registered in England with registered office at >> Denton Hall >> Ilkley West Yorkshire LS29 0HH. Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited is >> registered in Northern Ireland and its registered office is c/o Carson >> McDowell, Murray House, Murray Street, Belfast, BT1 6DN. >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/43a8025f/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 19:16:29 +0000 >> From: Brian Mulgrew <btmulg...@gmail.com> >> To: "Geoghegan, Stuart" <stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> >> Cc: OSL <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR into CUE CFA >> Message-ID: >> < >> cabpd6gevz3gx_ofqmucwvcshfolwr2c_mvqs9no1ljbwtsd...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >> >> Hi Stuart - try checking redirecting number outbound on your HQ gateway - >> if still an issue can you post a debug isdn q931 on hq and br2 gateways? >> >> hth >> Brian >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Geoghegan, Stuart < >> stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > Hi All**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > I am working with my lab using a centralized dialplan an my BR2/Site-C >> > phones have CUE (integrated with CUCM).**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > Everything works fine under Jtapi control and also using SIP when >> falling >> > back to SRST.**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > If I call from HQ to Site-C when there is not enough bandwidth and AAR >> > kicks in, again this works fine with dialing between sites using >> globalized >> > numbering and AAR \+.! Route patterns.**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > I can also allow the call from Hq-to Site-C phone forward-noan after the >> > timeout into CUE correctly and I can leave a message to the correct >> mailbox >> > (as the CTI Ports and Route Points are using the full External mask of >> the >> > CUE VM number). **** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > But, if I set the site C phone to CFA to CUE VM, when I dial using AAR >> > from another site ? I get prompted for**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > ?Enter your Id following by hash? as if I was just dialling the >> Voicemail >> > Pilot instead of being redirected by the extension. . **** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > Has anyone experienced this before? Or is is expected behaviour?**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > kind regards**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Stuart Geoghegan >> > >> > **** >> > >> > ** ** >> > The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is >> > confidential. It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, >> forwarded, >> > relied upon or used by any person other than the intended recipient. >> > Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you >> have >> > received this e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and >> > postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently delete it and any >> attachments. >> > NG Bailey may monitor email where it is considered proportionate to any >> > perceived risk. This email has been sent on behalf of an NG Bailey >> company, >> > if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which company. The NG Bailey >> > companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey IT Services >> Limited >> > (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited (5472032), Kedington >> > (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey Group Limited >> > (1490238). All of the companies, except Kedington (Northern Ireland) >> > Limited, are registered in England with registered office at Denton Hall >> > Ilkley West Yorkshire LS29 0HH. Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited is >> > registered in Northern Ireland and its registered office is c/o Carson >> > McDowell, Murray House, Murray Street, Belfast, BT1 6DN. >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/7b578f9e/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:13:30 +0530 >> From: Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> >> To: John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> >> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] transfer file to router with no tftp >> or ftp server >> Message-ID: >> <CAPBg9BJswred27yO2ZZO2cTdymm= >> wtqv5x1ba1jegmxz+gp...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Configure Router as FTP server >> >> Check this. >> >> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/11_3/feature/guide/ftpserve.html >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:27 PM, John Smith <cci...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > Forgive my ignorance, but if you needed to transfer a file from a PC to >> > a router and had no tftp server or ftp server on the PC, how could >> > accomplish that? Thank you. >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111105/b621c14e/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 06:16:11 +0530 >> From: Ken Wyan <kew...@gmail.com> >> To: "Abel ..." <midga...@gmail.com> >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SJ vs RTP >> Message-ID: >> < >> capbg9bjbvdbrltfa_dknrmb9x8xtmsqzkqmchn5z6u8b5zv...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Can anybody compare Brussels with US locations (RTP,SJ) >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111105/b813330e/attachment-0001.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:50:15 -0400 >> From: "Abel ..." <midga...@gmail.com> >> To: Nicolaers Luk <luk.nicola...@quentris-gdfsuez.be> >> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cRTP in nested CB traffic shaping >> policy >> Message-ID: >> <CAJ6s=ma7NguJWtTpLuZxEi9tDN5AjzdfF= >> gqkiiv6rv+nrt...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Can we see the class map for RTP Class? >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Nicolaers Luk < >> luk.nicola...@quentris-gdfsuez.be> wrote: >> >> > Hi,**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > I'm trying to setup CB traffic shaping with CRTP.**** >> > >> > This is the config of the policy maps:**** >> > >> > policy-map VOIP**** >> > >> > class RTP**** >> > >> > priority 28**** >> > >> > compress header ip rtp**** >> > >> > class SIG**** >> > >> > bandwidth 16**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > policy-map shape**** >> > >> > class class-default**** >> > >> > shape average 365600 3656**** >> > >> > service-policy VOIP**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > The policy-map shape is activated on the frame-relay map-class:**** >> > >> > map-class frame-relay toBR2**** >> > >> > frame-relay fragment 480**** >> > >> > service-policy output shape**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > This is configured on the HQ router and the Branch office router**** >> > >> > When I make a call I can see that RTP traffic is matched but the rtp >> > compression counters always remain at 0**** >> > >> > BRANCH#show policy-map interface serial 0/1/0.200**** >> > >> > Serial0/1/0.200: DLCI 200 -**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Service-policy output: shape**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Class-map: class-default (match-any)**** >> > >> > 403 packets, 27349 bytes**** >> > >> > 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps**** >> > >> > Match: any **** >> > >> > Queueing**** >> > >> > queue limit 64 packets**** >> > >> > (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0**** >> > >> > (pkts output/bytes output) 403/27349**** >> > >> > shape (average) cir 365600, bc 3656, be 3656**** >> > >> > target shape rate 365600**** >> > >> > lower bound cir 0, adapt to fecn 0**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Service-policy : VOIP**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > queue stats for all priority classes:**** >> > >> > Queueing**** >> > >> > queue limit 64 packets**** >> > >> > (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0**** >> > >> > (pkts output/bytes output) 252/15834**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Class-map: RTP (match-any)**** >> > >> > 252 packets, 15834 bytes**** >> > >> > 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps**** >> > >> > Match: access-group name RTP**** >> > >> > 252 packets, 15834 bytes**** >> > >> > 5 minute rate 4000 bps**** >> > >> > Priority: 28 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > compress:**** >> > >> > header ip rtp**** >> > >> > UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)**** >> > >> > Sent: 0 total, 0 compressed, **** >> > >> > 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent**** >> > >> > rate 0 bps**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Anyone that has an idea why the compression counters remain at 0?**** >> > >> > **** >> > >> > Thanks**** >> > >> > ** ** >> > >> > Luk**** >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111104/33193748/attachment.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCIE_Voice mailing list >> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >> >> >> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 12 >> ****************************************** >> > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
