Thanks to all for all of your input on this question. Based on my testing of the suggestions provided we are essentially always stripping down the ANI to 4 digits before routing to CUC, that is really our only option since I have stated that Alternate Extension is not allowed in my question. With this technique , if the ANI is read back to the message recipient it will be chopped down to the last 4 digits. I suppose this is okay as long as there is no requirement to play Senders ANI before the message ( which is off by default ) . I dont see a way around this drawback. But the XXXX on the hunt pilot calling party transform mask seems to do the job. If I were to see a question like this on the lab exam, i hope the grading gods will be on my side.
I do not think you can have it both ways, either CUC gets 4 digit ANI , finds the mailbox and prompts to sign in - and the ANI read back to the message recipient is 4 digits, or CUC gets 10 digits and you must use the Alternate Extension field to find the mailbox. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Pixar Perfect <pixarperf...@live.com>wrote: > the requirement is always for SiteB calling into SiteA voicemail by > hitting Messages button. SiteA is always MGCP gateway. Calling Party Xform > isnt any use on MGCP gateway for incoming calls. > > here is another way of doing it ... > > Voicemail Pilot for CUC is 2200 > > call-manager-fallback > voicemail 2777 ---> siteB specific > > translation-pattern on CUCM to convert 2777 into 2200 and mask calling > number XXXX. The CSS of the translation pattern should have access to 2200. > > > > there is no definitive answer as to which solution is graded positively. > there is a reason why many leading CCIE instructors say this is not a test > of best practices but a test of how like able is your solution to the > script. .. :) > > > > > > ------------------------------ > From: marth...@cisco.com > To: skeller...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 03:59:48 +0000 > > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate > Extension > > What about a calling party transform mask on the incoming gateway? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:43 PM, "Steve Keller" <skeller...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Bill, I like this option pretty well as it seems to limit > treatment of calls this way to CUC when site B is in SRST mode only. I > will try to lab this up tomorrow morning. Question for you, will this only > solve my issue of pressing the VM button to access my mailbox to retrieve a > message. Meaning when PSTN calls in to site B phone and then gets > forward(redirected) to voicemail, I use a dial-peer that provides RDNIS > capabilites to route the caller to the correct mailbox and not the opening > greeting. So with this would i still want to use the following to get the > caller into my mailbox? > > dial-peer voice 2600 pots > destination-pattern 2600 > port 0/0/0:23 > no digit-strip > prefix 202555 ( assuming no LD code at this site ) > > this is the way i get callers into my mailbox - using RDNIS. > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:49 PM, William Bell <b...@ucguerrilla.com>wrote: > > If you are told National calls must present a 10D ANI AND you are > restricted from using an alternate extension in CUC then I do the > following. I am not sure whether this would be graded right or wrong > > On the SRST device (assume basic SRST) > > > call-manager-fallback > max-ephone 10 > max-dn 20 oct > huntst chan 1 > voicemail 912025552699 ! or some unused DID on Site A > call-forward noan 912025552600 time 20 !assume VM pilot is 2600 > call-forward busy 912025552600 > time-z <whatever> > time-f <whatever> > date-f <whatever> > call-forward pattern .T > ! > <do your dial-peer work, as needed> > > > On CUCM: > > Create a PT: hq_gw-in_pt > Create a CSS: hq_gw_css > > Assign CSS to hq gateway > > Either > > a.) create a translation in hq_gw-in_pt > Pattern: 2699 > xform ANI: XXXX > xform DNIS: 2600 ! as in, redirect to regular VM pilot > CSS: your regular HQ phone CSS will do > > OR > > b.) create a new hunt pilot in hq_gw-in_pt > Pattern: 2699 > HL: your VM HL > xform ANI:XXXX > > > Why would I go this path? > > 1. We had a requirement that National calls are presented with a 10D ANI > in SRST mode. I assume that you would already have a translation-p that > handles this bit > > 2. We can't modify the CUC subscriber. > > 3. This method doesn't interfere with RDNIS to VM > > 4. This method doesn't interfere with direct or redirect calls from HQ > or SiteC > > > Anyway, that is my 2 cents. > > -Bill > > -- > William Bell > blog: http://ucguerrilla.com > twitter: @ucguerrilla > > > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Bill wrote: > > Traditionally you would use the alternate extension or a XXXX on the > pilot. So if you we're denied the ability to use alternate extension for > this task but had to use it for another, say allowing easy voicemail access > to a user at home, then I think you are looking at a very specific inbound > translation on your gateway or nay sending 4 digits if the PSTN allows. I > would definitely test out the translation setup to ensure you can do it. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Steve Keller <skeller...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In SRST mode, when the vm button is pressed, i have a dial-peer to route > this call to the vm hunt pilot on the UCM. > > > dial-peer voice 2600 pots > > description voicemail-pilot > > destination-pattern 2600 > > no digit-strip > > port 0/0/0:23 > > prefix 1408202 > > If i have to adhere to the requirement that LD calls should be 10 digit > ANI, then i am sending the full 10 digit ANI for this call as well ( even > though it more of a hidden number rather than an implicit user dialed > number) > > Thus the call arrives at site A GW with 10 digits , say 9723033002. > > In order to route this call to the correct mailbox i would have to use > Alternate Extension of 9723033002 and then i will be prompted to login. > > However, if i am not allowed to use alternate extension then i must have > another strategy. > > > here are the choices i can think of, please chime in if you too have > experienced this dilemma and what is the best way to solve it. > > > 1) do not send the full 10 digit ANI for this call and it will arrive at > site a GW as 4 digit ANI and then land in the mailbox, but not adhere to LD > calls should be 10 digit ANI requirement. > > > 2) put XXXX as calling party transform mask on the Hunt Pilot, thus > stripping the caller ANI to 4 digits and i can be prompted to log in. > However i think with this method, anytime the caller ANI is read to before > the message is played the caller id would incorrectly state from "3002" > instead of from "9723033002" > > > essentially, what is the best way for SRST users to access voicemail > when you are not permitted to use Alternate Extension. > > > thanks in advance all!! > > > steve > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > _______________________________________________ For more information > regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit > www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
