Sorry for revisiting this old thread. The Calling Party Transformation at the Device Pool level would come in handy for this particular need.
In the document starting 7.1.2, this is stated explicitly, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fscallpn.html#wp1325305 . *Cisco Unity/Cisco Unity Connection* .... .... Because no calling party transformation options exist in Cisco Unified Communications Manager Administration for voice-messaging ports, make sure that you configure the calling party number transformations in the device pool that is associated with the voice-messaging ports. ... .... Table 7-8 Configuring the Calling Party Transformation CSS to Localize the Calling Party Number Also mentioned "Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation CSS" as a method to Localize the Calling Party Number. ... ... The same document for 7.0.1 contained the table 7-8, but somehow doesn't have that explicit section on Cisco Unity/Cisco Unity Connection's calling party localization. (REF: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fscallpn.html#wp1276877) So, I am not so sure whether this is possible in CUCM 7.0.1/CUC 7.0.1. I don't have lab access to test this now, but would appreciate if anyone can help testing this. Note: I recall seeing some sort of Technotes outlining the strategy to perform Calling Party transformation for Call Manager 4.x or something that doesn't rely on Gateway's Calling Party Transformation. I can't locate it now, but if anyone could point me to the URL that would be great. Regards, --Somphol. On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Leslie Meade <leslie.me...@lvs1.com>wrote: > Easy way of doing this is to copy the hunt pilot and give it another > number.. set user caller ID and mask it to XXXX**** > > Then in the call-manager-fallback change the voicemail to the new hunt > pilot and your done**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Leslie Meade* **** > > .................................................................. * > Mobile:778.228.4339* | *Main:* *604.676.5239* > *Email:* leslie.me...@lvs1.com**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Chadi H Hassoune > (chassoun) > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:10 PM > *To:* Pixar Perfect; Mark Thrash (marthras); Steve Keller > *Cc:* CCIE Voice OSL > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate > Extension**** > > ** ** > > Calling Party Xform and assign it to the CUC Device Pool works fine for > me. **** > > ** ** > > HTH**** > > ** ** > > *From: *Pixar Perfect <pixarperf...@live.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:43 PM > *To: *"Mark Thrash (marthras)" <marth...@cisco.com>, Steve Keller < > skeller...@gmail.com> > *Cc: *CCIE Voice OSL <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate > Extension**** > > ** ** > > the requirement is always for SiteB calling into SiteA voicemail by > hitting Messages button. SiteA is always MGCP gateway. Calling Party Xform > isnt any use on MGCP gateway for incoming calls. **** > > ** ** > > here is another way of doing it ... **** > > ** ** > > Voicemail Pilot for CUC is 2200**** > > ** ** > > call-manager-fallback**** > > voicemail 2777 ---> siteB specific **** > > ** ** > > translation-pattern on CUCM to convert 2777 into 2200 and mask calling > number XXXX. The CSS of the translation pattern should have access to 2200. > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > there is no definitive answer as to which solution is graded positively. > there is a reason why many leading CCIE instructors say this is not a test > of best practices but a test of how like able is your solution to the > script. .. :) **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > From: marth...@cisco.com > To: skeller...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 03:59:48 +0000 > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate > Extension**** > > What about a calling party transform mask on the incoming gateway? > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:43 PM, "Steve Keller" <skeller...@gmail.com> wrote: > **** > > Thanks Bill, I like this option pretty well as it seems to limit > treatment of calls this way to CUC when site B is in SRST mode only. I > will try to lab this up tomorrow morning. Question for you, will this only > solve my issue of pressing the VM button to access my mailbox to retrieve a > message. Meaning when PSTN calls in to site B phone and then gets > forward(redirected) to voicemail, I use a dial-peer that provides RDNIS > capabilites to route the caller to the correct mailbox and not the opening > greeting. So with this would i still want to use the following to get the > caller into my mailbox?**** > > **** > > dial-peer voice 2600 pots**** > > destination-pattern 2600**** > > port 0/0/0:23**** > > no digit-strip**** > > prefix 202555 ( assuming no LD code at this site )**** > > **** > > this is the way i get callers into my mailbox - using RDNIS.**** > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:49 PM, William Bell <b...@ucguerrilla.com> > wrote:**** > > If you are told National calls must present a 10D ANI AND you are > restricted from using an alternate extension in CUC then I do the > following. I am not sure whether this would be graded right or wrong **** > > ** ** > > On the SRST device (assume basic SRST)**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > call-manager-fallback**** > > max-ephone 10**** > > max-dn 20 oct**** > > huntst chan 1**** > > voicemail 912025552699 ! or some unused DID on Site A**** > > call-forward noan 912025552600 time 20 !assume VM pilot is 2600**** > > call-forward busy 912025552600**** > > time-z <whatever>**** > > time-f <whatever>**** > > date-f <whatever>**** > > call-forward pattern .T**** > > !**** > > <do your dial-peer work, as needed>**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On CUCM:**** > > ** ** > > Create a PT: hq_gw-in_pt**** > > Create a CSS: hq_gw_css**** > > ** ** > > Assign CSS to hq gateway**** > > ** ** > > Either**** > > ** ** > > a.) create a translation in hq_gw-in_pt**** > > Pattern: 2699**** > > xform ANI: XXXX**** > > xform DNIS: 2600 ! as in, redirect to regular VM pilot**** > > CSS: your regular HQ phone CSS will do**** > > ** ** > > OR**** > > ** ** > > b.) create a new hunt pilot in hq_gw-in_pt**** > > Pattern: 2699**** > > HL: your VM HL**** > > xform ANI:XXXX**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Why would I go this path?**** > > ** ** > > 1. We had a requirement that National calls are presented with a 10D ANI > in SRST mode. I assume that you would already have a translation-p that > handles this bit**** > > ** ** > > 2. We can't modify the CUC subscriber.**** > > ** ** > > 3. This method doesn't interfere with RDNIS to VM**** > > ** ** > > 4. This method doesn't interfere with direct or redirect calls from HQ or > SiteC**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Anyway, that is my 2 cents.**** > > ** ** > > -Bill**** > > ** ** > > --**** > > William Bell**** > > blog: http://ucguerrilla.com**** > > twitter: @ucguerrilla**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Bill wrote:**** > > ** ** > > Traditionally you would use the alternate extension or a XXXX on the > pilot. So if you we're denied the ability to use alternate extension for > this task but had to use it for another, say allowing easy voicemail access > to a user at home, then I think you are looking at a very specific inbound > translation on your gateway or nay sending 4 digits if the PSTN allows. I > would definitely test out the translation setup to ensure you can do it. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Steve Keller <skeller...@gmail.com> wrote:*** > * > > In SRST mode, when the vm button is pressed, i have a dial-peer to route > this call to the vm hunt pilot on the UCM.**** > > ** ** > > dial-peer voice 2600 pots**** > > description voicemail-pilot**** > > destination-pattern 2600**** > > no digit-strip**** > > port 0/0/0:23**** > > prefix 1408202**** > > If i have to adhere to the requirement that LD calls should be 10 digit > ANI, then i am sending the full 10 digit ANI for this call as well ( even > though it more of a hidden number rather than an implicit user dialed > number)**** > > Thus the call arrives at site A GW with 10 digits , say 9723033002.**** > > In order to route this call to the correct mailbox i would have to use > Alternate Extension of 9723033002 and then i will be prompted to login.*** > * > > However, if i am not allowed to use alternate extension then i must have > another strategy.**** > > ** ** > > here are the choices i can think of, please chime in if you too have > experienced this dilemma and what is the best way to solve it.**** > > ** ** > > 1) do not send the full 10 digit ANI for this call and it will arrive at > site a GW as 4 digit ANI and then land in the mailbox, but not adhere to LD > calls should be 10 digit ANI requirement.**** > > ** ** > > 2) put XXXX as calling party transform mask on the Hunt Pilot, thus > stripping the caller ANI to 4 digits and i can be prompted to log in. > However i think with this method, anytime the caller ANI is read to before > the message is played the caller id would incorrectly state from "3002" > instead of from "9723033002"**** > > ** ** > > essentially, what is the best way for SRST users to access voicemail > when you are not permitted to use Alternate Extension.**** > > ** ** > > thanks in advance all!!**** > > ** ** > > steve**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________**** > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com**** > > ** ** > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com**** > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com**** > > > _______________________________________________ For more information > regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit > www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com**** > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
