Indeed, that does sound great - i'll try it out. Thanks very much for the reply!
On Sep 8, 9:29 am, Daniel Hommel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That sounds interesting! Thanks for the tip. :-) > > Roebuck, Alex writes: > > An alternative is to run your executable via psexec using the -i switch > > (interact with the desktop). For example: > > > psexec.exe -i 0 your.exe > > > This should enable your GUI executable to run, even when running CCNet as a > > service. > > >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897553.aspx > > > Regards, > > > Alex Roebuck. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > seffyroff > > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:27 PM > > To: ccnet-user > > Subject: [ccnet-user] Re: Executable Task Block Exec Environment Different > > Somehow? > > > That's acceptable to me. > > > One of these days I'll have the words 'Quick and dirty' mounted on a > > plaque above my desk. > > > Thanks for the help! > > > On Aug 29, 3:57 pm, Daniel Hommel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> seffyroff writes: > >>> What are the downsides to not running as a service? > >> Your "cruisecontrol user" needs to be logged in and have the console > >> runner running. That's not very elegant on a server. But as far as i can > >> tell it works quite well.
