I am indeed running 1.4.4 SP1. I double-checked for the warning and I found it. I missed it the first time around because of the fact that it is NOT present when a build is forced via the dashboard (I was testing that way). The warning is present when the interval trigger is run, though.
Here is the output of an non-forced integration (the warning is on the second line): "2009-06-22 11:58:02,246 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] Project: 'Aggregates - Release 1.0' is first in queue: 'Aggregates - Release 1.0' and shall start integration. 2009-06-22 11:58:02,293 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:WARN] "D:\Build directory\Aggregates" is not a svn working folder 2009-06-22 11:58:02,387 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] Starting process [svn] in working directory [D:\Build directory\Aggregates] with arguments [log https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/Aggregates/Release-1.0 -r "{2009-06-15T15:11:16Z}:{2009-06-22T15:58:02Z}" --verbose --xml -- non-interactive --no-auth-cache] 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] <? xml version="1.0"?> 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] <log> 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] </ log> 2009-06-22 11:58:02,856 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] No <logentry>s found under <log>. 2009-06-22 11:58:02,856 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] No modifications detected." Obviously, the warning is a false positive because Subversion is able to tell that there is no modifications (meaning that my working copy is up-to-date, which it is). A quick look in that folder confirms that there is a ".svn" folder. Also, note that CCNet did the initial check-out of that working copy. While checking the logs, I checked out the logs for our other projects: most, if not all, also exhibit this warning. Maybe there is something wrong with my configs after all? Could it be that the missing trailing slash in the directory string ("D:\Build directory\Aggregates") could cause this warning? Also, I cleaned-up the paths in my examples (to remove our company name). The real path contains 102 characters. Could the length of the path be a source of issues? Thanks. > On Jun 19, 5:49 am, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > are you sure that you're running SP1 on the build server, > because there is a log statement : > Util.Log.Warning(string.Format("{0} is not a svn working folder", wd)); > > so when the svn is not run, this should be in the log. > > can you double check this? > > with kind regards > Ruben Willems > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Ruben Willems <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi > > > your config looks ok :-( > > the only thing preventing the cleanup / revert from running is the > > following : > > the code checks that the working folder has a subfolder .svn or _svn > > if not found, do no execute > > > now comes the trick : which folder is ccnet checking? > > > I'll add more debug.log statements in the code, so in a future version I > > know what ccnet is doing where > > > if you view the project configuration via the validator / dashboard / > > project configuration, > > which folder do you see in the working directory IN the source control > > block? > > > with kind regards > > Ruben Willems > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Yop83 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I uploaded the project config here: > > >>http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=14cae1bed568604b4c17ca8801618ef7e0... > >> (The file is called "Aggregates.xml") > > >> We have multiple project files on our instance of CCNet, so we are > >> using <cb:include href="myProject.xml"> tags in the main ccnet.config > >> file. > >> That is why I did not post it: all of the logic (except a couple of > >> variables declaration) is done in the project config file. > > >> I hope this file can answer your questions. > >> If you need more info, don't hesitate. > > >> > On Jun 15, 2:31 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi > > >> > can you post your ccnet.config of the involved project? > >> > I'm intrested in the following : > >> > ° do you have a working folder set at the project level ? > >> > ° your svn section > > >> > with kind regards > >> > Ruben Willems > > >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Yop83 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > I'm using CCNet 1.4.4 SP1 (not a clean install, but an update). > > >> > > A project got stuck in the "exception" state recently because the > >> > > working copy was locked. This was a perfect opportunity for me to add > >> > > the new <cleanUp>true</cleanup> tag in the source control block of > >> > > that project. > > >> > > Of course it wasn't that easy... > > >> > > 1. I added the <cleanUp>true</cleanup> under the sourcecontrol block > >> > > of the affected project. > > >> > > 2. I insured the configuration was updated (by going in the "Project > >> > > Configuration" tag of the web dashboard and seeing that the tag is > >> > > correctly set to true). > > >> > > 3. I forced a build using the web dashboard. > > >> > > EXPECTED RESULTS: > >> > > 4. The build succeeds because of the cleanup command is run against > >> > > the working directory. > > >> > > ACTUAL RESULTS: > >> > > 4. The build still fails with the "working copy locked" error. No > >> > > changes. > > >> > > SERVER LOG: > >> > > Here is the server log related to the force build. As you will see, > >> > > there is no mention of the cleanup command in the SVN arguments: > >> > > "2009-06-15 11:06:49,658 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] Building: > >> > > Dashboard triggered a build (ForceBuild) > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,658 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] Starting > >> > > process [svn] in working directory [D:\Build directory\Aggregates] > >> > > with arguments [update "D:\Build directory\Aggregates" --non- > >> > > interactive --no-auth-cache] > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,705 [17060:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] > >> > > svn: Working copy 'D:\Build directory\Aggregates' locked > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,720 [17060:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] > >> > > svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for > >> > > details) > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:50,033 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] Integration > >> > > complete: Exception - 15/06/2009 11:06:49 AM" > > >> > > CONFIGURATION OF OUR SERVER: > >> > > CCNet 1.4.4 SP1 > >> > > SVN 1.6.2
