Sorry for the delay, I just came back from vacation :) So, I ran your snippet of code and got, as you expected: "True 1"
I guess this doesn't help very much. On a side note, I would like to point out that in certain cases, the SVN folder can be named "_svn" and not ".svn". This is an option (some would say "hack") that has been put into SVN to work around a stupid bug in Visual Studio .Net 2003 regarding folders that start with a "." and web projects. This option is supported by the command-line client. More info: http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/asp-dot-net-hack.txt This option is also supported in TortoiseSVN. More info: http://tortoisesvn.net/docs/release/TortoiseSVN_en/tsvn-dug-settings.html (read the "Use _svn instead of .svn directories" section) So, if the current "SVN working copy detection" code is limited to only looking for a ".svn" folder, you should expand it so it also looks for "_svn" folders. Thanks, And don't hesitate to send me any other tests that might help debug the "cleanup" situation. >On Jun 25, 2:47 am, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yop > > can you infome me what the outcome of the program is I wrote in the mail? > This should help us to pinpoint the problem. > > with kind regards > Ruben Willems > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Yop83 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am indeed running 1.4.4 SP1. > > I double-checked for the warning and I found it. > > I missed it the first time around because of the fact that it is NOT > > present when a build is forced via the dashboard (I was testing that > > way). > > The warning is present when the interval trigger is run, though. > > > Here is the output of an non-forced integration (the warning is on the > > second line): > > "2009-06-22 11:58:02,246 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] Project: > > 'Aggregates - Release 1.0' is first in queue: 'Aggregates - Release > > 1.0' and shall start integration. > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,293 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:WARN] "D:\Build > > directory\Aggregates" is not a svn working folder > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,387 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] Starting > > process [svn] in working directory [D:\Build directory\Aggregates] > > with arguments [loghttps://svn.mycompany.com/svn/Aggregates/Release-1.0 > > -r > > <https://svn.mycompany.com/svn/Aggregates/Release-1.0%0A-r>"{2009-06-15T15:11:16Z}:{2009-06-22T15:58:02Z}" > > --verbose --xml -- > > non-interactive --no-auth-cache] > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] <? > > xml version="1.0"?> > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] > > <log> > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,653 [1820:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 svn] </ > > log> > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,856 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] No > > <logentry>s found under <log>. > > 2009-06-22 11:58:02,856 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] No > > modifications detected." > > > Obviously, the warning is a false positive because Subversion is able > > to tell that there is no modifications (meaning that my working copy > > is up-to-date, which it is). > > A quick look in that folder confirms that there is a ".svn" folder. > > Also, note that CCNet did the initial check-out of that working copy. > > > While checking the logs, I checked out the logs for our other > > projects: most, if not all, also exhibit this warning. > > Maybe there is something wrong with my configs after all? > > > Could it be that the missing trailing slash in the directory string > > ("D:\Build directory\Aggregates") could cause this warning? > > Also, I cleaned-up the paths in my examples (to remove our company > > name). The real path contains 102 characters. > > Could the length of the path be a source of issues? > > > Thanks. > > > > On Jun 19, 5:49 am, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > are you sure that you're running SP1 on the build server, > > > because there is a log statement : > > > Util.Log.Warning(string.Format("{0} is not a svn working folder", > > wd)); > > > > so when the svn is not run, this should be in the log. > > > > can you double check this? > > > > with kind regards > > > Ruben Willems > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Ruben Willems <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > your config looks ok :-( > > > > the only thing preventing the cleanup / revert from running is the > > > > following : > > > > the code checks that the working folder has a subfolder .svn or _svn > > > > if not found, do no execute > > > > > now comes the trick : which folder is ccnet checking? > > > > > I'll add more debug.log statements in the code, so in a future version > > I > > > > know what ccnet is doing where > > > > > if you view the project configuration via the validator / dashboard / > > > > project configuration, > > > > which folder do you see in the working directory IN the source control > > > > block? > > > > > with kind regards > > > > Ruben Willems > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Yop83 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> I uploaded the project config here: > > > > >>http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=14cae1bed568604b4c17ca8801618ef7e0. > > .. > > > >> (The file is called "Aggregates.xml") > > > > >> We have multiple project files on our instance of CCNet, so we are > > > >> using <cb:include href="myProject.xml"> tags in the main ccnet.config > > > >> file. > > > >> That is why I did not post it: all of the logic (except a couple of > > > >> variables declaration) is done in the project config file. > > > > >> I hope this file can answer your questions. > > > >> If you need more info, don't hesitate. > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 2:31 pm, Ruben Willems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > Hi > > > > >> > can you post your ccnet.config of the involved project? > > > >> > I'm intrested in the following : > > > >> > ° do you have a working folder set at the project level ? > > > >> > ° your svn section > > > > >> > with kind regards > > > >> > Ruben Willems > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Yop83 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > I'm using CCNet 1.4.4 SP1 (not a clean install, but an update). > > > > >> > > A project got stuck in the "exception" state recently because the > > > >> > > working copy was locked. This was a perfect opportunity for me to > > add > > > >> > > the new <cleanUp>true</cleanup> tag in the source control block of > > > >> > > that project. > > > > >> > > Of course it wasn't that easy... > > > > >> > > 1. I added the <cleanUp>true</cleanup> under the sourcecontrol > > block > > > >> > > of the affected project. > > > > >> > > 2. I insured the configuration was updated (by going in the > > "Project > > > >> > > Configuration" tag of the web dashboard and seeing that the tag is > > > >> > > correctly set to true). > > > > >> > > 3. I forced a build using the web dashboard. > > > > >> > > EXPECTED RESULTS: > > > >> > > 4. The build succeeds because of the cleanup command is run > > against > > > >> > > the working directory. > > > > >> > > ACTUAL RESULTS: > > > >> > > 4. The build still fails with the "working copy locked" error. No > > > >> > > changes. > > > > >> > > SERVER LOG: > > > >> > > Here is the server log related to the force build. As you will > > see, > > > >> > > there is no mention of the cleanup command in the SVN arguments: > > > >> > > "2009-06-15 11:06:49,658 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] Building: > > > >> > > Dashboard triggered a build (ForceBuild) > > > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,658 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:DEBUG] Starting > > > >> > > process [svn] in working directory [D:\Build directory\Aggregates] > > > >> > > with arguments [update "D:\Build directory\Aggregates" --non- > > > >> > > interactive --no-auth-cache] > > > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,705 [17060:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 > > svn] > > > >> > > svn: Working copy 'D:\Build directory\Aggregates' locked > > > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:49,720 [17060:DEBUG] [Aggregates - Release 1.0 > > svn] > > > >> > > svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' > > for > > > >> > > details) > > > >> > > 2009-06-15 11:06:50,033 [Aggregates - Release 1.0:INFO] > > Integration > > > >> > > complete: Exception - 15/06/2009 11:06:49 AM" > > > > >> > > CONFIGURATION OF OUR SERVER: > > > >> > > CCNet 1.4.4 SP1 > > > >> > > SVN 1.6.2
