Maybe this will help you. http://ccnetconditional.codeplex.com/
On 24 fév, 10:46, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting idea, and it would probably work, but then each time I want to > expand this scheme to build from another branch (which eventually may be 5 or > 6) I need to have yet another project, rather that just an additional > permissible dynamic value. I can't believe there isn't a better way to do > this. > > - Justin > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Ruben Willems wrote: > > > Hi > > > you can use the pre-processor to reduce the duplication > >http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Configuration... > > > with kind regards > > Ruben Willems > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because in every other regard they are identical. I don't want the > > maintenance headache of having to maintain multiple project configurations > > when we need to tweak something in the future. > > >> On Feb 23, 2010 3:16 AM, "Ruben Willems" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi > > >> why not set up 2 CCnet projects? > > >> 1 for the release branch > >> 1 for the beta branch > >> each has its own labeller --> makes it more easy > > >> and with 1.5 this allows also for easier security administration > > >> with kind regards > >> Ruben Willems > > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:18 AM, jekagan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Hey all, > > >> > I'm trying to... -- To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
