Hi

it seems to be 100% ported :

http://csut017.wordpress.com/2010/04/06/conditional-plug-in/
so you'll need a 1.6 build


with kind regards
Ruben Willems

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Rémi Royer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Maybe this will help you.
>
> http://ccnetconditional.codeplex.com/
>
>
>
> On 24 fév, 10:46, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interesting idea, and it would probably work, but then each time I want
> to expand this scheme to build from another branch (which eventually may be
> 5 or 6) I need to have yet another project, rather that just an additional
> permissible dynamic value.  I can't believe there isn't a better way to do
> this.
> >
> > - Justin
> >
> > On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Ruben Willems wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> >
> > > you can use the pre-processor to reduce the duplication
> > >http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Configuration.
> ..
> >
> > > with kind regards
> > > Ruben Willems
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Justin Kagan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Because in every other regard they are identical.  I don't want the
> maintenance headache of having to maintain multiple project configurations
> when we need to tweak something in the future.
> >
> > >> On Feb 23, 2010 3:16 AM, "Ruben Willems" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Hi
> >
> > >> why not set up 2 CCnet projects?
> >
> > >> 1 for the release branch
> > >> 1 for the beta branch
> > >> each has its own labeller --> makes it more easy
> >
> > >> and with 1.5 this allows also for easier security administration
> >
> > >> with kind regards
> > >> Ruben Willems
> >
> > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:18 AM, jekagan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> > Hey all,
> >
> > >> > I'm trying to...
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>

Reply via email to