*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
I agree with this. Science is already 'way too specialized. The attraction of
the ccp4 board is its relative breadth of discussion.
Keep the odd ball question coming.
Nic out
--
-------------------------
C. Nicklaus Steussy, M.D., Ph.D.
Purdue University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------
Satheesh Kumar Palani Nathan wrote:
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
I think, most of the non-ccp4 questions are really interesting and
useful. Without those, its going to be real “dry”.
In other words, let’s also have some appetizer and dessert – so that we
can enjoy the full meal. Of course not too much dessert or appetizer ( I
think, I am kind of hungry today :) )
Cheers
Satheesh
Probably because BIOLOGY is important ?
What would you do without the protein guys, how would you grow your
crystals ?
Juergen
Clara L. Kielkopf wrote:
It is saddening that a crystallography newsgroup has become a forum
for discussing cloning. What is our field coming to?
Clara
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. P.Satheesh Kumar
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Texas A&M University, 2128 TAMU
College Station, TX - 77843-2128
USA.
Ph. 1-979-862-7639
