*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Aww, c'mon folks. Do we really need to haze the poor guy? It wasn't
even his fault!
For my part, I'm just glad I've got a last name not amenable to
becoming a unit of measurement. Whew.
Art
On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Kendall Nettles wrote:
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Could be anything repetitive and overwhelming. For example, after
looking at
stacks of crystal trays all morning, I can say "I got swanned."
hmmm, maybe
we should try the detergent screen....
Kendall
From: James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:07:30 -0800
To: CCP4 bulletin board <ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: 'swan' a (new) unit of measure?
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
One mole of emails, as pointed out by Dan Anderson.
On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Steve Lane wrote:
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Is a 'swan' a (new?) unit of measure? And, if so, of what, exactly?
I kind of like it ;)
--
Steve Lane
System, Network and Security Administrator
Doudna Lab
Biomolecular Structure and Mechanism Group
UC Berkeley
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:14:30AM +0100, Flip Hoedemaeker wrote:
---cut---
Ok, maybe we should stop this thread some time soon, is not just
the mail
bombs that kill you, its the people that start shouting to the
board about
it. BTW, I only received 35 Swans, thats not too bad!
Flip
