J. Appl. Cryst.
I have used it for things which I think need publishing, but are of more
abstract subjects and less direct interest to the biological
crystallography.
However, politics and finances may dictate otherwise. Acta D has for
some reason a rather poor impact rating, and J. Appl. Cryst. a rather
better one. I am 'encouraged' towards using J. Appl. Cryst. even when it
is less suitable for the target audience.
Kevin
Marius Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I was wondering whether someone of you has reported/published
new or improved crystallographic software somewhere
else than Acta Cryst. It would be nice if you could
share your experience with me. Topics might be:
- quality of the journal
- rapid publication
- literate peers
- ...
Thank you very much in advance
Marius
PD Dr. habil. Marius Schmidt
Physikdepartment E17
Technische Universitaet Muenchen
James Franck Strasse
85747 Garching/Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.physik.tu-muenchen.de/marius/
phone: +49-(0)89-2891-2550
fax: +49-(0)89-2891-2548
