Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: Other sciences have struggled with this and seem to have found an answer. Have e.g. a look at http://heasarc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/fits.html
kind regards, Klaas > > This is a good time to start a major crystallogrpahic image > archiving effort. Money may well be available now that will not be > avialable six month from now, and we have good, if not perfect, > solutions available for many, if not all, of the technical issues > involved. Is it really wise to let this opportunity pass us by? > >>> The deposition of images would be possible providing some consistent >>> imagecif format was agreed. >>> This would of course be of great use to developers for certain >>> pathological cases, but not I suspect much value to the user >>> community - I down load structure factors all the time for test >>> purposes but I probably would not bother to go through the data >>> processing, and unless there were extensive notes associated with >>> each set of images I suspect it would be hard to reproduce sensible >>> results. >>>
