And I apologize for being crabby about it.  I realize its hard
for people from different traditions and different native
tongues to figure out the best way to start an English letter
to people you've never met.



---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:50:28 -0000
>From: Debajyoti Dutta <debajyoti_dutt...@rediffmail.com>  
>Subject: [ccp4bb] I apologize  
>To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>
>   Hi everybody,
>
>   I really apologize to every members of CCP4BB for
>   not to give attention to my addressing phrase. It is
>   truly misleading. I swear not to make such bad
>   mistake in future. I am really ashamed for such a
>   deed.
>
>   Sincerely
>   Debajyoti Dutta
>
>   On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:29:23 +0530 wrote
>   >Dear Sir,
>   Please don't assume that all crystallographers are
>   male.
>
>   ---- Original message ----
>   >Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:45:55 -0000
>   >From: Debajyoti Dutta
>   <debajyoti_dutt...@rediffmail.com>
>   >Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] cyseteine modification
>   >To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>   >
>   > Dear Sir,
>   >
>   > Thank you all who have replied. I jast want to
>   > enquire that if there is any option in coot to
>   > introduce the OH bond with Cys residue as well as
>   to
>   > introduce the secondary peptide like bond between
>   > carboxylic carbon with amino group of lys.
>   >
>   > Sincerely
>   > Debajyoti Dutta
>   >
>   > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:58:44 +0530 wrote
>   > >
>   >
>   > Dear Debajyoti
>   >
>   > There is also the sulfenic acid species (-S-OH)
>   > which is actually
>   > the first oxidized form of sulfhydryls on the way
>   to
>   > sulfonic acid. However
>   > sulfenic acids are very susceptible to further
>   > oxidation to sulfinic and sulphonic
>   > acids, and therefore need a protective chemical
>   > environment to remain stable.
>   >
>   > See for example some previous work of ours on
>   > sulfenic and
>   > sulfinic forms of active-site cysteines in
>   > glutathione reductase (Nature
>   > Structure Biology vol 5, 267-271, 1998) and the
>   > corrresponding pdb entries 1dnc
>   > and 1gsn.
>   >
>   > Best regards
>   >
>   > Savvas
>   >
>   > ----
>   > Savvas Savvides
>   > L-ProBE, Unit for Structural Biology
>   > Ghent University
>   > K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35
>   > 9000 Ghent, BELGIUM
>   > office: +32-(0)9-264.51.24 ;mobile:
>   > +32-(0)472-92.85.19
>   > Email: savvas.savvi...@ugent.be
>   > http://www.lprobe.ugent.be/xray.html
>   >
>   > From: CCP4 bulletin board
>   > [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
>   > Debajyoti Dutta
>   > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 4:42 PM
>   > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>   > Subject: [ccp4bb] cyseteine modification
>   >
>   > Dear Sir,
>   >
>   > Is there any other oxidation states of cysteine
>   > other than cysteine sulphinic
>   > acid and cysteine sulphonic acid. In my protein,
>   the
>   > cysteine molecule is
>   > definitely overoxidized but the electron density
>   is
>   > not corresponding to the
>   > sulphinic or the sulphonic acid. The positive
>   > density looks as if it can
>   > accomodate only one oxygen atom and not more.
>   >
>   > Thank you for reply in advance.
>   >
>   > Sincerely
>   > Debajyoti Dutta
>   >
>   > >
>   > >E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor
>   > (6.1.0.447)Database version:
>   >
>   6.13080http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>   >
>   > [IMG]
>   Phoebe A. Rice
>   Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular
>   Biology
>   The University of Chicago
>   phone 773 834 1723
>  
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
>
>   RNA is really nifty
>   DNA is over fifty
>   We have put them
>   both in one book
>   Please do take a
>   really good look
>   http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp
>
>   [IMG]                                                
Phoebe A. Rice
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
phone 773 834 1723
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123

RNA is really nifty
DNA is over fifty
We have put them 
  both in one book
Please do take a 
  really good look
http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp

Reply via email to