Hi all,
I am running into a strange behaviour fo xds for a primitive cubic
data set.
Neither in the INTEGRATE nor in the CORRECT step the cell parameters
are refined and stay exactly at the value specified in XDS.INP. R-
factors and I/sigmas of the XSCALE run look suspiciously high/low.
When I reduce the symmetry to tetragonal and run an otherwise
identical XDS.INP script, the cell parameters are refined again.
Any ideas?
Thanks a bunch
Jan
--
Jan Abendroth
deCODE biostructures
Seattle / Bainbridge Island WA, USA
work: JAbendroth_at_decode.is
home: Jan.Abendroth_at_gmail.com
