On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Anastassis Perrakis wrote: > How very correct. And if anyone is doubt, remember the fiasco of the 'memory > of water', published in Nature. > To borrow the title of DVD's talks, "Just because its in Nature, it does not > mean its true".
Or, as one of my colleagues is known to say: "It's in Nature, and it's even right!" >> More specifically, we are seeing "peer review" at work. I that the >> implementation of peer review as part of the publication has perhaps >> lead us to forget that peer review is a longer term, ongoing process, >> conducted by the whole scientific community. > > A.
