Hi Priscalla and Flip,

I did not bother to find out what format the maps had, I just loaded
them in coot with no problems. I fitted a cyclohexane ring with three
atoms attached to it (see attached pdb). It fits quite well, but there
are two cautions:

1) it is impossible to deduce the type of atoms from this map, so the
carbons may be oxygen, nitrogen, whatever.
2) The molecule might have a disordered attachment or binding mode and
may be larger as what is fitted.

It will be a nice puzzle to find out (biochemically, literature) what
exactly is bound, but it is clearly some ligand molecule and not PEG.

Good luck!
Herman 

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 4:39 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density

Hi Flip,

Following your suggestion, I send the link to download the screenshots
of the ligand density:
http://twitpic.com/2tn35i

Best regards

Priscila



________________________________________
From: Flip Hoedemaeker [fhoe...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Flip
Hoedemaeker [f...@formulatrix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:18 AM
To: Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] unknown density

Hi Priscilla,

I don't think a lot of people will take the trouble to find out for
themselves which format your map files have... Its better to send screen
shots, better still to put your screenshots on a social media page
(facebook, twitpic, whatever) and email the link.

Flip

On 10/1/2010 13:12, Priscila Oliveira de Giuseppe wrote:
>   Hi, everyone,
>
>   I solved a structure at 1.7 A. After fitting all residues into the 
> model, I found an extra density at the catalytic site. The components 
> of the crystallization condition did not explain it (crystallization 
> condition: 40% PEG200, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, protein buffer: PBS)
>
> Neither substrates nor products of this enzyme fitted this density.
>
> I modelled two PEG molecules with half occupancy. They fitted very
well, but I am not convinced that this is the best explanation.
>
>   Does anyone figure out what this density can be? Attached to this
e-mail I send the maps and a pdb file with the residues surrounding the
ligand density.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Priscila

Attachment: UKN.pdb
Description: UKN.pdb

Reply via email to