So from where does Wyatt outsource their columns?

JPK

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Sally Pham Thanh Van
<sally.pha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  I should say clearer that I did a comparison between GE (Superdex 200
> 10/30) and the Wyatt column of the same separation range on AKTA
> connected with MALS. The Wyatt column gave better resolution for size
> exclusion chromatography as well as signal-noise ratio for light
> scattering. So I think it is worth for you to try it. They offer
> money-back guarantee.
>
> Best wishes,
> Sally.
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sally Pham Thanh Van
> <sally.pha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Sebastiano,
>>
>> From my experiences, Wyatt columns are the best.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Sally.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Sebastiano Pasqualato
>> <sebastiano.pasqual...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> I was wondering if somebody could help me out by suggesting the "best" 
>>> column to be used in a Static Light Scattering (I guess it would be the 
>>> same for a Multi Angle Light Scattering) instrument.
>>> We were suggested using a silica-based column, with very high separation 
>>> properties, but it seems that these columns are highly sensitive to (even 
>>> slightly) basic pH's. Even running the column in PBS, it looks like 
>>> injecting samples at pH 8.0 ruins the column resin, making it unusable.
>>> On the other hand, GE Healthcare columns would require a huge amount of 
>>> material to be loaded.
>>> What are you guys using in your instruments?
>>> Thanks a lot in advance for the feedback,
>>> best,
>>> ciao
>>> Sebastiano
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD
>>> Crystallography Unit
>>> IFOM-IEO Campus
>>> Cogentech - Consortium for Genomic Technologies
>>> via Adamello, 16
>>> 20139 - Milano
>>> Italy
>>>
>>> tel +39 02 9437 5172
>>> fax +39 02 9437 5990
>>>
>>
>



-- 
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
*******************************************

Reply via email to