Hello everyone,
I have a 2.3A data set that could be scaled in C 2 2 21  and P 1 21 1 
Intensity statistics tests indicate twinning (pseudo-merohedral h,-k,-h-l in P 
1 21 1)
I find a good MR solution and when I try to refine it with the twin law I get 
fairly good maps and decent Rs 21-28%. I can see features tha were not in the 
search model
Which leads me to think that this a valid solution. The one thing that bothers 
me however is the fact that my beta angle in P 1 21 1 is 104 (not close to 90) 
and that the geometry gets worse after refinement?
Any suggestions?
cheers

Reply via email to