-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In ccp4-6.3.0, the chiral volume of SO4 is marked as 'both'.
 SO4      chir_01  S      O1     O2     O3        both

Tim

On 07/11/12 12:39, Robbie Joosten wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> 
> 
> I prefer the swapping of atom names, which is pretty much what the
> program chiron does, over hacking the restraint file. The latter
> makes the problem reappear as soon as you use your PDB file on a
> machine with an 'unhacked' restraint file.
> 
> 
> 
> @Ian: You'd be surprised how well Refmac can flatten sulfates if
> you have a chiral volume outlier (see Figure 1d in Acta Cryst. D68:
> 484-496 (2012)).
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Robbie
> 
> 
> 
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
> Of Eleanor Dodson Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:15 To:
> CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Chiral volume outliers
> SO4
> 
> 
> 
> Well - the problem may well be here - in the REFMAC dictionary
> (see $CLIBD/monomers.s.SO4.cif ) the chiral volume calculation uses
> at the order of the O numbering around the S atom . So if your O
> numbering is not right handed you will have the chiral volume 
> calculated as positive, not negative.
> 
> There are various fixes. Edit the SO4 and just the numbering of 2
> of the O atoms - eg use labels: S O2 O1 O3 Or edit the SO4.cif to
> have SO4      chir_01  S      O1     O2     O3 both
> 
> Eleanor
> 
> 
> loop_ _chem_comp_chir.comp_id _chem_comp_chir.id 
> _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_centre _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_1 
> _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_2 _chem_comp_chir.atom_id_3 
> _chem_comp_chir.volume_sign SO4      chir_01  S      O1     O2
> O3        negativ
> 
> On 11 July 2012 10:59, Tim Gruene <t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear Joel,
> 
> out of curiosity: what is "the Chiral volume outliers issue"?
> 
> Cheers, Tim
> 
> 
> On 07/11/12 01:00, Joel Tyndall wrote:
>> Hi people,
> 
>> We are refining a structure with sulfates and we are getting the 
>> Chiral volume outliers issue. I understand the problem as being 
>> computational where the oxygens are in reality equivalent but 
>> computationally named differently. I have seen the recent Acta 
>> Cryst D paper (April 2012 - PDB_REDO) which talks about this
>> issue and mentions the development of Chiron which could fix this
>> issue.
> 
>> Is there a way to fix this problem using existing tools (or 
>> editing).
> 
>> We have ~20 sulfates in our protein (10-mer system)
> 
>> Thanks heaps
> 
>> Joel
> 
>> _________________________________ Joel Tyndall, PhD
> 
>> Senior Lecturer in Medicinal Chemistry National School of
>> Pharmacy University of Otago PO Box 56 Dunedin 9054 New Zealand
>> Skype: jtyndall
> 
>> Ph: +64 3 479 7293 <tel:%2B64%203%20479%207293>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFP/Vt+UxlJ7aRr7hoRAu3aAJ9lBBav5Fz9W310QZCA+8hBrvYyEACfe/wV
a56yOVyYtgOODEN2ypSLMA0=
=9yvs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to