I apologise for typing in dark. That is why "know" substitute "no" :-\ Dr Felix Frolow Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel
Acta Crystallographica F, co-editor e-mail: mbfro...@post.tau.ac.il Tel: ++972-3640-8723 Fax: ++972-3640-9407 Cellular: 0547 459 608 On Nov 12, 2012, at 19:05 , Felix Frolow <mbfro...@post.tau.ac.il> wrote: > Traditional crystallography is difficult to practice, unless you know > mathematics, physics, chemistry, computing etc….. :-) > If one need to make science with room temperature diffraction, there is know > substitution to old type glass capillaries that can be properly sealed :-\ > > FF > Dr Felix Frolow > Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology, > Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology > Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel > > Acta Crystallographica F, co-editor > > e-mail: mbfro...@post.tau.ac.il > Tel: ++972-3640-8723 > Fax: ++972-3640-9407 > Cellular: 0547 459 608 > > On Nov 12, 2012, at 19:00 , Nian Huang <huangn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> I would recommend an alternative >> http://www.mitegen.com/products/micrort/micrort.shtml >> Traditional capillary is a pain to handle, unless you have a rock sized >> crystal. >> Good luck, >> Nian Huang >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Michael Roberts <mrobert...@talktalk.net> >> wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I would be interested to learn of other crystallographers' experience in >> their use of glass capillaries for protein crystal growth and X-ray >> diffraction clarity. >> There are many types of glass available - quartz, soda glass, borosilicate, >> etc. Are there specific types which people prefer for best results overall? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Michael Roberts >> >
