On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 18:09 +0200, Tim Gruene wrote:
> the answers you received were correct with respect to the question you
> asked. If they are not satisfactory, you have not given sufficient
> information.
>
Tim,
Not sure when I expressed any dissatisfaction with replies I received.
I asked whether someone had a simple tool to turn v3 DNA records back to
v2. I got an excellent off-list suggestion to use Remediator tool from
kinemage/molprobity (writen by Jeff Headd and Robert Immormino).
It was probably easy to guess that I tried pdbvconv and ran into
problems (in fact, buster takes care of conversion internally unless it
fails). I appreciate your initial comment that pdbvconv works for you
and was simply pointing out that my observations are not of general
nature and obviously specific to a particular file I was trying to
convert. It appears that you were offended by that and if so, it was
not my intent. In my defense, I only asked for available conversion
tools and did not ask specifically for help with pdbvconv. With this in
mind, I hope I can be forgiven for not posting unpublished structural
model on a bulletin board in order to provide sufficient information for
answering a question I did not ask.
If you are interested in specifics, the problem was that some other
program made residue names left-justified.
Cheers,
Ed.
--
"Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!"
Julian, King of Lemurs
