Hi,

I am a long time user of XDS (20 years this year) but all the same I find that 
I have constant angst about losing observations because I don't understand what 
goes in in the conversion steps to get to CCP4 format. I used to believe that 
XSCALE was always necessary, and I always use it in my workflow even if there 
is only one dataset (after all, there's nothing to lose), but my Ph.D. students 
pointed out to me that XDSCONV could take output directly from CORRECT, and 
they often do it this way. The XDS wiki and XDSCONV docs seems to confirm this: 
using MERGE=TRUE in XDSCONV should output the geometrical mean of the 
observations. However I am worried by what the XDSCONV output says. For today's 
example CORRECT gives me this:

NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS IN SELECTED SUBSET OF IMAGES  190093
NUMBER OF REJECTED MISFITS                            3842
NUMBER OF SYSTEMATIC ABSENT REFLECTIONS                 34
NUMBER OF ACCEPTED OBSERVATIONS                     186217
NUMBER OF UNIQUE ACCEPTED REFLECTIONS                44059

XDSCONV says the following:

FRIEDEL'S_LAW=TRUE
MERGE=TRUE
NUMBER OF REFLECTION RECORDS ON INPUT FILE      190093
NUMBER OF IGNORED REFLECTIONS (I< -3.0*SIGMA)       19
NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS ACCEPTED FROM INPUT FILE   44047

To my literal mind this says it is throwing away most of the observations. Now 
if I merge the reflections in XSCALE first it says this:

FRIEDEL'S_LAW=TRUE
MERGE=TRUE
NUMBER OF REFLECTION RECORDS ON INPUT FILE       44046
NUMBER OF IGNORED REFLECTIONS (I< -3.0*SIGMA)        0
NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS ACCEPTED FROM INPUT FILE   44046

which makes more sense. If I compare the first few reflections of the output 
file with structure factor amplitudes from XDSCONV for each scenario they are 
different, but I believe that is because XSCALE has put the intensities on an 
absolute scale and CORRECT has not.

Basically all I want to know is that the output from XDSCONV is misleadingly 
worded, i.e. that even if it appears to say that only the asymmetric unit has 
been accepted, actually all observations have gone in and the geometric mean is 
indeed output. That would put my mind to rest!

/Derek
________________________________________________________________________
Derek Logan                                         tel: +46 46 222 1443
Associate Professor                                 mob: +46 76 8585 707
Dept. of Biochemistry and Structural Biology              
www.cmps.lu.se<http://www.cmps.lu.se>
Centre for Molecular Protein Science           
www.maxlab.lu.se/node/307<http://www.maxlab.lu.se/node/307>
Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden





Reply via email to