Yes.., I too had similar problem with Ctruncate, and used older truncate to overcome the issue.
Best Wishes, Partha On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, jie liu <jl1...@njms.rutgers.edu> wrote: > Hi > > I also encountered the same problem after recent updates (not the most > recent one, but a couple of updates back). Choosing to run old-truncate > will get it around. > > Best wishes > > Jie > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "<Stephen Carr>" < > stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk> > To: <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:11 PM > Subject: [ccp4bb] ctruncate error > > > > Dear CCP4bb, > > I am experiencing an unusual error when running truncate. The program > appears to be converting I's to F's, but then failing to output them in the > resulting mtz file, see mtzdump output below: > > Col Sort Min Max Num % Mean Mean Resolution Type > Column > num order Missing complete abs. Low High label > > 1 ASC 0 26 0 100.00 12.6 12.6 79.95 3.00 H H > 2 NONE 0 15 0 100.00 4.3 4.3 79.95 3.00 H K > 3 NONE -42 42 0 100.00 0.7 16.0 79.95 3.00 H L > 4 NONE 0.0 19.0 0 100.00 9.56 9.56 79.95 3.00 I > FreeR_flag > 5 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 F > F_delta16 > 6 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 Q > SIGF_delta16 > 7 BOTH 0.0 0.0 25 99.81 0.00 0.00 42.22 3.00 D > DANO_delta16 > 8 BOTH 0.0 0.0 11253 13.22 0.00 0.00 42.22 3.00 Q > SIGDANO_delta16 > 9 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 G > F_delta16(+) > 10 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 L > SIGF_delta16(+) > 11 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 G > F_delta16(-) > 12 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00 L > SIGF_delta16(-) > 13 BOTH 0 0 25 99.81 0.0 0.0 42.22 3.00 Y > ISYM_delta16 > 14 NONE -8.9 72479.2 25 99.81 198.34 198.44 42.22 3.00 J > IMEAN_delta16 > 15 NONE 0.6 3135.7 25 99.81 5.25 5.25 42.22 3.00 Q > SIGIMEAN_delta16 > 16 NONE -10.8 72479.2 25 99.81 198.18 198.37 42.22 3.00 K > I_delta16(+) > 17 NONE 0.0 3135.7 25 99.81 6.79 6.79 42.22 3.00 M > SIGI_delta16(+) > 18 NONE -9.5 72479.2 25 99.81 198.30 198.47 42.22 3.00 K > I_delta16(-) > 19 NONE 0.0 3135.7 25 99.81 6.70 6.70 42.22 3.00 M > SIGI_delta16(-) > > > No. of reflections used in FILE STATISTICS 12968 > > The truncate log file shows no obvious errors apart from the cumulative > intensity plot which indicates no reflections, all other diagnostic > indicators for data quality seem to suggest everything is ok. I get the > error with both ctruncate and truncate and also automatically as part of > the scaling/merging pipelines. The data were processed with imosflm, > scaled with aimless with neither flagging any errors with the data. I am > running CCP4 6.4.0 on a linux box (Centos 6) and have installed the latest > updates. Any suggestions as to what the fault might be and how to get > around it would be greatly appreciated. > > best wishes, > > Steve > > Dr Stephen Carr > Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH) > Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Harwell Oxford > Didcot > Oxon OX11 0FA > United Kingdom > Email stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk > tel 01235 567717 > This email and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or > privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If > you are not the intended addressee or an authorized recipient of the > addressee, please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not > use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to > this email. > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of the Research Complex at Harwell. > > There is no guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from > viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain > as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the > message. > > We use an electronic filing system. Please send electronic versions of > documents, unless paper is specifically requested. > > This email may have a protective marking, for an explanation, please see: > http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About/informationandstandards/ > documentmarking/index.htm. >