Hi,
I too had a similar error when trying to process very weak
data integrated to the edge of a detector.
The log showed lots of "0.0" and "-nan".
Sometimes the program went into an infinite loop and
tried to consume all the memory of the system.
Applying a reasonable high resolution cutoff by SFTOOLS
solved the problem.
Best regards,
Takanori Nakane
On 2014-06-20 10:49, <Stephen Carr> wrote:
Thanks for the help, the old version of truncate did the trick.
Interestingly running the old version of truncate in either of the
data reduction pipelines (with aimless or scala) produced mtz files
containing no F's but the stand alone version produced an mtz with all
the f's prsent.
cheers,
Steve
Dr Stephen Carr
Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot
Oxon OX11 0FA
United Kingdom
Email stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk
tel 01235 567717
________________________________
From: Parthasarathy Sampathkumar [spart...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2014 19:55
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] ctruncate error
Yes.., I too had similar problem with Ctruncate, and used older
truncate to overcome the issue.
Best Wishes,
Partha
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, jie liu
<jl1...@njms.rutgers.edu<mailto:jl1...@njms.rutgers.edu>> wrote:
Hi
I also encountered the same problem after recent updates (not the most
recent one, but a couple of updates back). Choosing to run
old-truncate will get it around.
Best wishes
Jie
----- Original Message ----- From: "<Stephen Carr>"
<stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk<mailto:stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk>>
To: <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:11 PM
Subject: [ccp4bb] ctruncate error
Dear CCP4bb,
I am experiencing an unusual error when running truncate. The program
appears to be converting I's to F's, but then failing to output them
in the resulting mtz file, see mtzdump output below:
Col Sort Min Max Num % Mean Mean Resolution
Type Column
num order Missing complete abs. Low High
label
1 ASC 0 26 0 100.00 12.6 12.6 79.95 3.00
H H
2 NONE 0 15 0 100.00 4.3 4.3 79.95 3.00
H K
3 NONE -42 42 0 100.00 0.7 16.0 79.95 3.00
H L
4 NONE 0.0 19.0 0 100.00 9.56 9.56 79.95 3.00
I FreeR_flag
5 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
F F_delta16
6 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
Q SIGF_delta16
7 BOTH 0.0 0.0 25 99.81 0.00 0.00 42.22 3.00
D DANO_delta16
8 BOTH 0.0 0.0 11253 13.22 0.00 0.00 42.22 3.00
Q SIGDANO_delta16
9 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
G F_delta16(+)
10 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
L SIGF_delta16(+)
11 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
G F_delta16(-)
12 BOTH ? ? 12968 0.00 ? ? -999.00 0.00
L SIGF_delta16(-)
13 BOTH 0 0 25 99.81 0.0 0.0 42.22 3.00
Y ISYM_delta16
14 NONE -8.9 72479.2 25 99.81 198.34 198.44 42.22 3.00
J IMEAN_delta16
15 NONE 0.6 3135.7 25 99.81 5.25 5.25 42.22 3.00
Q SIGIMEAN_delta16
16 NONE -10.8 72479.2 25 99.81 198.18 198.37 42.22 3.00
K I_delta16(+)
17 NONE 0.0 3135.7 25 99.81 6.79 6.79 42.22 3.00
M SIGI_delta16(+)
18 NONE -9.5 72479.2 25 99.81 198.30 198.47 42.22 3.00
K I_delta16(-)
19 NONE 0.0 3135.7 25 99.81 6.70 6.70 42.22 3.00
M SIGI_delta16(-)
No. of reflections used in FILE STATISTICS 12968
The truncate log file shows no obvious errors apart from the
cumulative intensity plot which indicates no reflections, all other
diagnostic indicators for data quality seem to suggest everything is
ok. I get the error with both ctruncate and truncate and also
automatically as part of the scaling/merging pipelines. The data were
processed with imosflm, scaled with aimless with neither flagging any
errors with the data. I am running CCP4 6.4.0 on a linux box (Centos
6) and have installed the latest updates. Any suggestions as to what
the fault might be and how to get around it would be greatly
appreciated.
best wishes,
Steve
Dr Stephen Carr
Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Oxford
Didcot
Oxon OX11 0FA
United Kingdom
Email
stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk<mailto:stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk>
tel 01235 567717
This email and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and
or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee
only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorized recipient
of the addressee, please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail
and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information
in or attached to this email.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the Research Complex at Harwell.
There is no guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from
viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may
sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or
with the message.
We use an electronic filing system. Please send electronic versions of
documents, unless paper is specifically requested.
This email may have a protective marking, for an explanation, please
see:
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About/informationandstandards/documentmarking/index.htm.
This email and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and
or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee
only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorized recipient
of the addressee, please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail
and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information
in or attached to this email.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the Research Complex at Harwell.
There is no guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from
viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may
sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or
with the message.
We use an electronic filing system. Please send electronic versions of
documents, unless paper is specifically requested.
This email may have a protective marking, for an explanation, please
see:
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About/informationandstandards/documentmarking/index.htm.