Just a few observations:

I ran 
echo MODE SFCALC XYZIN\\n SYMM P21\\n RESO 30 3 | sfall xyzin a.pdb hklout 
temp.mtz > a.log
and
echo MODE SFCALC XYZIN\\n SYMM P21\\n RESO 30 3 | sfall xyzin b.pdb hklout 
temp.mtz > b.log
and looked at a.log and b.log

They differ only as follows: a.log has
  First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
     16204FE1  ICS      6496 10.0180 -7.5680 56.1090 1.00    5.97    6
   fractional coordinates  0.38411-0.05791 0.55929


  First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
     16289FE1  ICS      7496 35.7530  7.5810-12.1820 1.00    5.91    6
   fractional coordinates  0.38376 0.05800-0.12143
  First 10 atoms of sorted file in asym unit -  
       20.61588   0.44071   0.44209    105.97 1.00         6  ***ZZZ  END 
       10.38376   0.87857   0.05800    205.91 1.00         6  ***ZZZ  END 

  First atom of sorted file in atsort 
       20.61588   0.44071   0.44209    105.97    131.00  ***ZZZ  END 

whereas b.log has
  First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
     16204FE1  ICS      6496 35.7530  7.5810-12.1820 1.00    5.91    6
   fractional coordinates  0.38376 0.05800-0.12143


  First 10 atoms of atsort - orthog coordinates
     16289FE1  ICS      7496 10.0180 -7.5680 56.1090 1.00    5.97    6
   fractional coordinates  0.38411-0.05791 0.55929
  First 10 atoms of sorted file in asym unit -  
       10.38376   0.87857   0.05800    105.91 1.00         6  ***ZZZ  END 
       20.61588   0.44071   0.44209    205.97 1.00         6  ***ZZZ  END 

  First atom of sorted file in atsort 
       10.38376   0.87857   0.05800    105.91    131.00  ***ZZZ  END 

What I don't understand is why the sorted lists are different? Sorting should 
make the resulting lists look the same, to my limited understanding. What is 
peculiar about the coordinates of these atoms is that there x coordinate in 
fractional units is almost the same, and their y coordinate is mirrored at the 
origin.Maybe that could play a role.

Kay

Reply via email to