Dear all Hello again
Thanks a lot for the numerous input. I received a dataset which was processed to 2.4A but refined to 3A -- this was the background I raised this question in the first place. Then I looked at the aimless statistics. At 2.4A the high resolution bin CC1/2 0.626, I/sigI 2.0, Completeness 84.6, Multiplicity 1.7 (P1 spacegroup). I suspect the reason for the refinement resolution limit to be set at 3 A was simply due to better Rw/Rf (0.236/0.294 at 3A; 0.284/0.341 at 2.4A). Based on these information am I justified to say that data quality at 2.4 A was suboptimal? In this case do you think refining at a (much) lower resolution is acceptable? Best regards Sam On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 13:43, Sam Tang <samtys0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone > > Sorry for a naive question. Is there any circumstances where one may wish > to refine to a lower resolution? For example if one has a dataset processed > to 2 A, is there any good reasons for he/she to refine to only, say 2.5 A? > > Thanks! > > Sam Tang > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
