On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:52:49PM -0400, Dan Weber wrote: > > Whoa! The memory leak is directly proportianate to the rtp timestamp. > For instance, if you set the timestamp to i and increment each time you'll > never experience the leak. However, if you multiply i*160 (20*8000/100), > the memory usage will grow real fast. In fact, it has nothing to do with > actual leakage, its just overallocating memory. How do we fix this? > > Dan
Is the overallocation somehow related to the number of packets sent/received per second? Is it only related to the timestamp? Could you post a simple example that reproduces that behavior? _______________________________________________ Ccrtp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel
