> On Mar 14, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Christian Corti
> <c...@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Doug Ingraham wrote:
>> The only difference in NiMH and NiCd charging schemes occurs when rapid
>> charging them. When rapid charging both types would use a DV/DT technique
>> coupled with a temperature sensor. The DV/DT is much smaller for NiMH than
>> NiCd. So if they went to the effort to recharge fast after an event (why
>> since you could probably do several retracts on a charge) you would not
>> want to use NiMH replacement batteries. It is unlikely that anything other
>> than a trickle charge was used with these batteries since it is cheap,
>> simple and reliable. The trickle current would have been 30 to 50 ma. I
>
> Hello... we're talking about an RK05... no fast or trickle charging at all.
> The battery charge circuit consists of a 750 ohms resitor in series with a
> D672 diode and the battery, attached between ground and -15V.
That fits with Doug's comment: 20 mA charge current (ignoring the internal
resistance of the battery).
Interesting that they used a battery; I thought the usual mechanism was a large
capacitor, I hadn't seen batteries used for this.
paul
