On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 02:37:19PM -0500, Eric Christopherson via cctalk wrote: > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > [...] > > ####> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mx2.ezwind.net ####> > X-Spam-Flag: YES ####> > X-Spam-Level: ************ > > > > So, why it was passed and not simply bit-bucketed is a mystery to me. > > > > > > --Chuck > > > > Strangely, the original message went through Gmail just fine, but your > reply (Chuck) is flagged as spam. > > -- > Eric Christopherson
Actually, in my mbox the message from Chuck (message id: <82445620-73b1-af30-2e1d-3317d7aab...@sydex.com>) is tagged as not spam. What really happened, I think gog has their own spam solution, and a little bit wonky one, so it interpreted part of Chuck's msgbody as part of msgheader, because it is/was part of some header and had been inserted into the body as it was, i.e. without leading space, hash, bang or anything, which could distinguish it as a not-header (see above, I have marked those lines with quad hashes, then see the body of Chuck's message). Of course other programs were able to understand that once header ends, the rest is a message body. Maybe they did one sort too many and thus part of body has got where only header lines were supposed to go. I smell hashtable packed with lines, or something that similarly anonymises the origin of text parts. Hard to believe I spent so much time on writing this, given that it is going to be lost as offtopic and generally "not our problem" (well, not mine, but if I ever process email with my own code, this one is good to remember - some people deliberately insert header lines into their body). -- Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home ** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com **
