On 4/12/22 11:41 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I don't know anything about the 3 Mb/s prototype other than that it existed. When I speak of Ethernet and its "day 1" I mean 10 Mb/s Ethernet as defined by the DEC/Intel/Xerox spec.

Okay.  Fair enough.

I surmise that we're talking about Ethernet II a.k.a. the Digital / Intel / Xerox that was commercialized.

Repeaters are a core part of that spec, and they were among the first wave of products delivered by DEC.

I can see how the need for repeaters was learned during Ethernet research at Xerox PARC and incorporated into Ethernet II / DIX from the start.

I no longer remember. That's possible, or perhaps they were a number of small segments each with a handful of stations on them.

That would make /some/ sense. E.g. have a 10Base2 segment for a set of cubicles and then link the multiple segments together with a multi-port bridge.

That's true but only part of the story. For one thing, as I said, both mechanisms were part of bridges from the start (at least from the start of DEC's bridges, which may not be quite the very earliest ever but certainly are the earliest significant ones).

Fair enough.

The learning part of bridging is actually the hard part.  ...

I feel like the conceptual algorithm / logic is simple. I concede that implementing it within timing requirements could be non-trivial ~> difficult.

Spanning tree is indeed another algorithm / protocol, but it's a control plane algorithm with relatively easy time constraints, so it's just SMOP.

I guess I always assumed that spanning tree came along /after/ and / or /independently/ of bridging / switching.

After all, the BPDU in spanning tree is "Bridge ..." so that name tends to imply to me that it came about /after/ bridges were a thing on at least some level.

That rings a bell.  Someone reminded me of 100Base-T4.

T4 rings a bell for me. -- It reminds me of some references to T2 and T8. It seems as if there was great conflation between the number being reference to wires; 4 vs 8, and pairs; 2 vs 4, respectively.

In any case, there were two proposed, one that made it. The other might have gone as far as one or two shipping products, but no further than that.

Yep.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Reply via email to