Point of order for the dummies: what is a tape seal?

Sellam

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:36 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 11/14/22 04:25, Shoppa, Tim via cctalk wrote:
> > I've been reporting on 9-track tape seal failures over at least the past
> 2 decades here.
> >
> > I first noticed the problem in the very early 2000's, and thought it was
> just random onesy-twosy failures, possibly contributed to by ozone in LA
> region, but over the past 20 years the failures have progressed.
> >
> > Sometime in the past couple weeks the last of my "soft" 9-track tape
> seals failed, because there is nothing but broken tape seals left hanging
> in the Wright-Line rack that had all my "new" aka 3M Blackwatch 703 tapes.
> >
> > Very very few of the older (I think of them as IBM or 70's/80's style)
> "hard plastic" tape seals failed.
> >
>
> I wrote about this problem here at least 2 or 3 years ago,  Although
> there must have been millions of these soft seals manufactured (that's
> not an exaggeration; the US government, for example, used hundreds of
> thousands of them).  And yes, the IBM autoloader tape seal(for 3400
> series drives) is very durable--I haven't seen many of these fail.
>
> But what I call the "Wright Line" PVC tape seal will age out and
> eventually crack and break.  Usually this occurs where the "hook" is
> attached, due to the attachment being a hole punched in the PVC belt.
> On a couple of occasions, I've had the seals split longitudinally. This
> is almost epidemic on 1960s and 70s 7 track tapes, due to their age.
>
> Locating replacements has proven to be an exercise in futility,
> particularly when one realizes that even relatively new ones are doomed
> to fail.
>
> What I've done for customers is return their 10.5" reels in 16mm
> plastic tape "cans" in the 800' size.  The fit is perfect and I've
> received no complaints.  Film "cans" for smaller reels are also
> available.  My source for these is Urbanski Film, although there are
> other vendors--and the "cans" are still being manufactured.
>
> --Chuck
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to