On Thu, Dec 22, 2022, 6:16 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >> Win95/Win98 would be happy with a PC/AT 286, with appropriate RAM > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > > I don't think "happy" is how I would describe that. > > Would it run? Maybe. > > Would I want to run it like that? Nope. Not at all. > > I stand corrected. > "Run", no. > "limp along", yes > It could do a few useful things; but was far from suitable for general > purpose. > Shirley none of you are serious about a 32-bit (at least partially) operating system being able to execute on a 286 processor. You couldn't even run Windows 3.1 in Enhanced mode on a 286 processor. >
