Well there is an agreement that if paul ever got tired of ai, lost interest, and wanted to get rid of it then I would show up with a U-Haul to pick it up off the dock.
All this has happened before, all this will happen again. Digex, sandstorm, ftp, etc. Funny I thought it would end with Paul. CZ (My burden, I'm stuck with it) On April 25, 2023 3:50:33 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Koning via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > >> On Apr 25, 2023, at 9:43 AM, geneb via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Tom Hunter via cctalk wrote: >> >>> Hopefully the LCM will be sold as a going concern rather than just a >>> firesale of the assets. >> AFAIK, it's a 503(c), and I suspect if they started to "fire sale" assets, >> lawsuits from folks that made significant donations would be inbound. > >Maybe, but what grounds would there be for a suit? If you donate to the >museum, the thing becomes their property, to dispose of as they see fit. That >is, unless you have a contract that says otherwise -- and even so, you'd have >to hope that a court would enforce a contract. There is ample precedent of >courts disregarding the plain English text of contracts or trusts to permit >museums to do things prohibited by the terms of agreements with donors. A >recent one (name forgotten) in Pennsylvania comes to mind. > > paul > >
